Resolution of labor conflicts in pricing and conflict commissions in the early Soviet period
https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2020-25-186-216-223
Abstract
We analyze the historical regulatory framework of the activity of pricing and conflict commissions of the early Soviet period, which existed during the period of the new economic policy. The relevance of the study lies in the fact that the quasi-judicial activity of pricing and conflict commissions is poorly studied, in this regard, the study of the quasi-judicial functions of pricing and conflict commissions is of historical importance, and also has parallels with the practice of modern labor dispute commissions. The aim of the work is to study the activity of pricing and conflict commissions during the period of the new economic policy with the study of the first Soviet regulatory documents, as well as the reconstruction of their history on archival materials of the Tambov Governorate. The research methods were the formal legal analysis of historical and legal acts of the Soviet era: a comparative analysis of the powers and activities of quasi-judicial bodies and people’s courts. Conclusions are drawn about the full formal conformity of the judicial process in modern world courts and historical quasi-judicial bodies that resolved labor disputes in the 1920s, the hierarchy of these bodies and the regulatory legal framework of their activities, as well as their integration into the system of Soviet public authorities, were reconstructed. We analyze the principles of the judicial process implemented in the activities of the commissions, such as the principles of openness, transparency, equality of parties.
About the Author
A. G. Fakurdinova
Tambov State Technical University; Linear Division of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation at the Moscow–Ryazanskaya Station
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alla G. Fakurdinova, Post-Graduate Student, “History and Philosophy” Department; Deputy Head of the Investigation Department.
106 Sovetskaya St., Tambov 392000
Komsomolskaya Sq., Moscow 107140
References
1. Khanukayeva T.E. Zakonodatel’noye regulirovaniye al’ternativnykh sposobov razresheniya trudovykh sporov o prave v Rossii: istoricheskiy analiz [Legislative regulation of alternative methods of resolving labor disputes about law in Russia: historical analysis]. Vestnik Universiteta im. O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA) – Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 2017, no. 10 (38), pp. 247-253. (In Russian).
2. Bril G.G. Trudovyye konflikty v gody pervoy pyatiletki (1928–1933 gg.): predposylki vozniknoveniya i sposoby ikh razresheniya [Labour conflicts during the first Five-Year Plan in the USSR planned economics (1928–1933): prerequisites for creation and ways to resolve them]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vestnik Of Kostroma State University, 2017, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 251-254. (In Russian).
3. Krasilnikov S.A. Na izlomakh trudovoy konfliktologii: trudovoye pravo v kontse 1920-kh gg. [On the breaks in labor conflictology: labor law in the late 1920s]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya – The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series History, 2018, vol. 26, pp. 73-82. (In Russian).
4. Vinogradova O.A. Iz istorii stanovleniya instituta razresheniya individual’nykh trudovykh sporov v Rossii [From history оf formation оf institute оf permission оf individual labour disputes in Russia]. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye – Administrative Consulting, 2013, no. 3, pp. 95-105. (In Russian).
5. Yudina T.V. Rastsenochno-konfliktnyye komissii na kontsessionnykh predpriyatiyakh SSSR v gody novoy ekonomicheskoy politiki [Pricing and conflict commissions at USSR concession enterprises during the years of the new economic policy]. Magistra Vitae: elektronnyy zhurnal po istoricheskim naukam i arkheologii – Magistra Vitae: An Electronic Journal on Historical Sciences and Archeology, 2009, no. 16 (154), pp. 44-48. (In Russian).
6. Chernova O.A. Deyatel’nost’ professional’nykh soyuzov po razresheniyu trudovykh konfliktov na predpriyatiyakh tsentral’nogo Chernozem’ya v 1920-e gody (po materialam Kurskoy i Voronezhskoy gubernii) [The activities of trade unions in resolving labor conflicts at enterprises of the central Chernozem region in the 1920s (based on materials from the Kursk and Voronezh Governorates)]. Nauchnyye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya – Scientific Bulletins of the Belgorod State University. Series: History. Political Science, 2010, no. 19 (90), issue 16, pp. 188-196. (In Russian).
7. Proshina N.M. Sovetskoye trudovoye zakonodatel’stvo 20-kh godov i profsoyuzy (na primere konfliktnykh situatsiy v ural’skoy metallopromyshlennosti) [Soviet labor legislation of the 20s and trade unions (on the example of conflict situations in the Ural metal industry)]. Problemy istorii Rossii. Vyp. 2: Opyt gosudarstvennogo stroitel’stva XV–XX vv. [Problems of history of Russia. Issue 2: Experience of State Building of 15th – 20th Centuries]. Yekaterinburg, Volot Publ., 1998, pp. 260-268. (In Russian).
8. Pastukh M.P. Materialy rastsenochno-konfliktnykh komissiy promyshlennykh predpriyatiy g. Tyumeni v 1921–1929 gg. kak istoricheskiy istochnik [Materials of rate-conflict committees of industrial enterprises in Tyumen in 1921–1929 as historical source]. Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye. Voprosy teorii i praktiki – Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. Tambov, Gramota Publ., 2014, no. 6 (44), pp. 149-151. (In Russian).
9. Yarov S.V. Predposylki konformizma: prekrashcheniye zabastovok v Petrograde v 1917–1925 gg. [Prerequisites for conformism: the cessation of strikes in Petrograd in 1917–1925]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal – Sociological Journal, 2007, no. 2, pp. 109-146. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Fakurdinova A.G. Resolution of labor conflicts in pricing and conflict commissions in the early Soviet period. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2020;25(186):216-223. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2020-25-186-216-223
Views:
27
Email this article 