Preview

Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities

Advanced search

Inter-program continuity in the system of spiritual and moral education: pedagogical logic of age development

https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-4-917-933

Abstract

Importance of the study is due to the problem of fragmentation and lack of continuity in the programs of spiritual and moral education, especially in Sunday schools, which reduces their effectiveness. There is a shortage of studies combining theoretical justification with practical tools and empirical verification.

Materials and Methods. The study is conducted in the longitudinal format (“before–after”) over two academic years. It involved 384 students of Sunday schools of the Udmurt Republic (6–16 years old), distributed into experimental and control groups. The effectiveness of four original programs is assessed according to four criteria (cognitive, emotional-volitional, motivationalvalue, behavioral) using validated diagnostic tools (tests, observation, expert assessments). To analyze the data, the methods of mathematical statistics are used (χ² criterion, Student’s t-test).

Results and Discussion. Statistically significant positive dynamics are revealed for all criteria in the experimental group (p < 0.01), while there is none in the control group. The most pronounced growth is observed in the motivational-value (up to 48.9 %) and behavioral (up to 54.4 %) spheres in adolescents aged 12–14. The results confirm that the implementation of the inter-program continuity model ensures the progressive development of value consciousness and the consolidation of morally oriented behavior as a personal trait.

Conclusion. The developed inter-program continuity model is an effective mechanism for ensuring holistic spiritual and moral development. The practical significance of the work lies in the possibility of using the model and diagnostic tools for planning educational work and training teachers. Prospects for further research are associated with adapting the model to secular educational contexts and expanding the geography of the sample.

About the Author

M. A. Sannikov
K.D. Ushinsky Institute for the Development of Education
Russian Federation

Maksim A. Sannikov, Priest, Rector

80 Balezinskaya St., Izhevsk, 426052 



References

1. Slobodchikov V.I., Ostapenko A.A. (2021). Vospitanie chelovecheskogo v cheloveke... Mekhanicheskii konstruktor ili organicheskaya sistema? Narodnoe obrazovanie = National Education, no. 6(1489), pp. 26-39. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/cjeygd

2. Abramov S.I. (2022). Dukhovno-nravstvennoe vospitanie lichnosti v usloviyakh letnego detskogo lagerya: iz opyta pedagogicheskoi deyatel'nosti studentov kafedry pedagogiki PSTGU. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya = St. Tikhon’s University Review. Pedagogy. Psychology, no. 66, pp. 56-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15382/sturIV202266.56-66, https://elibrary.ru/usjutk

3. Popova N.A. (2020). Shkola – tsentr preemstvennosti po dukhovno-nravstvennomu vospitaniyu doshkol'noi i nachal'noi stupeni obrazovaniya na osnove pravoslavnoi kul'tury. Mezhregional'nye Pimenovskie chteniya = Interregional Pimenov Readings, no. 17, pp. 365-369. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oqbgrn

4. Zhiyenbayeva N.B., Abdrakhmanova R.B., Abdrakhmanov A.E., Tapalova O.B., Kassenova S., Uaidullakyzy E. (2014). Experimental study of students’ spiritual-moral development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 131, pp. 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.149

5. Nazarenko-Matveeva T.M., Nechaev M.P., Oreshkina A.K. (2023). Matritsa tsennostei kak instrument upravleniya dukhovno-nravstvennym razvitiem i vospitaniem obuchayushchikhsya. Vestnik RMAT = Bulletin of RMAT, no. 4, pp. 55-64. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jsedek

6. Kokovina L.N., Marchenko L.A. (2024). Dukhovno-nravstvennoe vospitanie podrastayushchego pokoleniya v pravoslavnoi voskresnoi shkole. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, no. 85-4, pp. 185-188. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zdzyoo

7. Sapozhnikova A.G. (2023). Osnovy postroeniya modeli dukhovno-nravstvennogo vospitaniya mladshikh shkol'nikov v Zabaikal'skoi pravoslavnoi gimnazii. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1111-1120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2023-28-3-1111-1120, https://elibrary.ru/dootun

8. Divnogortseva S.Yu. (2024). Tsennosti kak yadro dukhovnonravstvennogo vospitaniya lichnosti: ot issledovanii v pedagogike do normativnoi dokumentatsii i praktiki realizatsii. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya = Bulletin of the Orthodox St. Tikhon Humanitarian University. Series 4: Pedagogy. Psychology, no. 74, pp. 52-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15382/sturIV202474.52-64, https://elibrary.ru/odrcsc

9. Petrova-Gjorgjeva E. (2010). Democratic society and moral education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 5635–5640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.919

10. Bezdushkov V.P., Noskov I.A. (2021). O smysle i tseli vospitaniya. Mir obrazovaniya - obrazovanie v mire = World of Education - Education in the World, no. 4(84), pp. 62-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51944/2073-8536_2021_4_62, https://elibrary.ru/epprhk

11. Kolmogorova L.S. (2002). Diagnostika psikhologicheskoi kul'tury shkol'nikov: Prakt. posobie dlya shk. Psikhologov. Moscow, VLADOS-PRESS Publ., 360 p. (In Russ.)

12. Kotlyakov V.Yu. (2013). Metodika «Sistema zhiznennykh smyslov». Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, no. 2-1(54), pp. 148-153. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qbfavv

13. Lusher M. (2004). Tsvetovoi test Lyshera. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 190 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qxjojn

14. Il'in E.P. (2001). Emotsii i chuvstva. St. Petersburg, 752 p. (In Russ.)

15. Luskanova N.G. (1993). Metody issledovaniya detei s trudnostyami obucheniya. Moscow, Folium Publ., 64 p. (In Russ.)

16. Psikhologicheskie testy: v 2 tomakh. T. 1 (2007). Ed. by A.A. Karelin. Moscow, VLADOS-Press Publ., 311 p. (In Russ.)

17. Andreev V.I. (2012). Pedagogika: Uchebnyi kurs dlya tvorcheskogo samorazvitiya. Kazan, Tsentr innovatsionnykh tekhnologii Publ., 608 p. (In Russ.)

18. Shchurkova N.E. (2002). Pedagogicheskaya tekhnologiya. Moscow, Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii Publ., 224 p. (In Russ.)

19. Volkov A.A., Maslova T.F., Dzhegutanova N.I. (2024). Faktory formirovaniya dukhovno-nravstvennykh tsennostei starshikh podrostkov. Gumanizatsiya obrazovaniya = Humanization of Education, no. 2, pp. 91-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2541-8734-2024-2-91-104, https://elibrary.ru/lewkis

20. Tan B.P., Naidu N.B.M., Jamil@Osman Z. (2018). Moral values and good citizens in a multi-ethnic society: A content analysis of moral education textbooks in Malaysia. The Journal of Social Studies Research, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2017.05.004

21. Croitoru I., Munteanu H. (2014). The moral-religious education – a support of self-conscience training. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 116, pp. 2155–2163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.536

22. Mantrova M.S. (2020). K voprosu dukhovno-nravstvennogo vospitaniya mladshikh shkol'nikov. Karel'skii nauchnyi zhurnal = Karelian Scientific Journal, vol. 9, no. 3(32), pp. 51-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26140/knz4-2020-0903-0012, https://elibrary.ru/vpsxzg

23. Gleeson J., O'Flaherty J. (2016). The teacher as moral educator: Comparative study of secondary teachers in Catholic schools in Australia and Ireland. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 55, pp. 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.12.002

24. Sheludyakov P.E. (2024). Sushchnost' i problemy dukhovno-nravstvennogo vospitaniya v praktike raboty pravoslavnogo pedagoga. Vestnik Penzenskoi dukhovnoi seminarii = Bulletin of the Penza Theological Seminary, no. 4(34), pp. 67-75. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/trehpw

25. Perminova L.M. (2020). Logiko-didakticheskie i psikhologo-pedagogicheskie osnovaniya preemstvennosti v sisteme nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya. Tsennosti i smysly = Values and Meanings, no. 2(66), pp. 99-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2071-6427-2020-10017, https://elibrary.ru/sgcuej

26. Sklyarova N.Yu., Brodovskaya E.V. (2023). Traditsionnye rossiiskie dukhovno-nravstvennye tsennosti v sisteme zhiznennykh prioritetov molodezhi, poluchayushchei pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Humanities. Bulletin of the Financial University, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 6-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-5-6-16, https://elibrary.ru/fwmrga

27. Kostyukova T.A., Petrova G.I., Sklyarova T.V., Simakova T.P. (2015). Self-determination of youth and traditional moral values: The role of Russian literature. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 200, pp. 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.062

28.


Review

For citations:


Sannikov M.A. Inter-program continuity in the system of spiritual and moral education: pedagogical logic of age development. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2025;30(4):917-933. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-4-917-933

Views: 24


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-0201 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5825 (Online)