Philosophical bases of divergent thinking

Importance. At the current stage of socio-economic development of the country, society’s need for specialists with divergent thinking, which allows thinking innovatively, solving non-standard tasks in conditions of uncertainty and rapid change of situation in different ways is actualized. However, there is a problem associated with the lack of a common theoretical basis and methodological approaches to the study the divergent thinking. It is assumed that it is possible to understand the nature of divergent thinking through philosophical comprehension of its generic concept “thinking”. The aim of the research is to scientifically substantiate the category of "divergent thinking" from the philosophical point of view.

Materials and Methods. Achievement of the set goals was carried out on the basis of retrospective analysis of philosophical, literature and scientific publications on the topic of research.

Results and Discussion. The main essential characteristics of thinking and thought operations underlying it in general and divergent thinking in particular were determined. The conceptual character of thinking based on judgments, inferences and concepts is defined. It was found out that the regularities of thought processes are conditioned by such thought operations as synthesis, analysis, generalization, classification, abstraction and others. At the same time, the heuristic nature of cognitive process is provided by means of intuitive insight. It is concluded that the foundation of the phenomenon under study is the dialectical nature of thinking aimed at research and resolution of contradictions.

Conclusion. The field of application of the obtained results is the definition of the essence of divergent thinking of university students, research of the problem of its formation and further development.

1. Makarova L.N., Kochukova O.N. (2022). Divergent thinking of students: categorical and conceptual analysis. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 847-861. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2022-27-4-847-861, https://elibrary.ru/dvqbei

2. Dzhokhadze D.V. (2012). The antique dialogue and dialectics. Filosofiya i obshchestvo = Philosophy and Society, no. 2 (66), pp. 23-45. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ozpclr

3. Egorova O.A. (2016). Problem of human existence and cognition in classical ancient philosophy. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, no. 12-1 (74), pp. 63-70. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wyosab

4. Bogomolov A.S. (2006). Antichnaya filosofiya [Antique Philosophy]. Moscow, Higher Education Publ., 388 p. https://elibrary.ru/qwnjmr

5. Mochalova I.N. (2008). Dialektika v antichnoi filosofskoi traditsii: ot sofistov do neoplatonikov [Dialectics in the Ancient Philosophical Tradition: from the Sophists to the Neoplatonists]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A.S. Pushkina = Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal, vol. 2, no. 3 (14), pp. 7-19. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vpjuhr

6. Lewes G.H. (1998). Antichnaya filosofiya: ot Evklida do Prokla [Ancient Philosophy: From Euclid to Proclus]. Minsk, Publishing and Commercial Community “Galaxias”, 224 p. (In Russ.)

7. Guilford J. (1965). Tri storony intellekta [The Three Sides of Intelligence]. Psikhologiya myshleniya [Psychology of Thinking]. Moscow, pp. 433-456. (In Russ.)

8. Eremina L.I. (2013). Formirovanie kreativnosti studentov v protsesse sotsial’nogo vospitaniya [Students’ Creativity Development in the Process of Social Education]. Ulyanovsk, Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University Publ., 136 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tlvaun

9. Sokolov V.V. (2004). Istoricheskoe vvedenie v filosofiyu: Istoriya filosofii po epokham i problemam [Historical Introduction to Philosophy: History of Philosophy by Eras and Issues]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 912 p. https://elibrary.ru/qwhryn

10. Kochukova O.N. (2020). Filosofskie aspekty divergentnogo myshleniya v gnoseologicheskikh teoriyakh antichnykh myslitelei [Philosophical aspects of divergent thinking in the epistemological theories of ancient philosophers]. In: Makarova L.N. (executive ed.). Materialy 11 Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi Internet-konferentsii (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) «Prepodavatel’ vysshei shkoly: traditsii, problemy, perspektivy» [Proceedings of the 11th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Internet Conference (with international participation) “Teacher of Higher School: Traditions, Problems, Perspectives”]. Tambov, Publishing House “Derzhavinsky”, pp. 100-106. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/svuenf

11. Neretina S.S. (academ. ed.). (2001). Antologiya srednevekovoi mysli (Teologiya i filosofiya evropeiskogo Srednevekov’ya): v 2 t. [Anthology of Medieval Thought (Theology and Philosophy of the European Middle Ages): in 2 vols.]. St. Petersburg, Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute Publ., vol. 1, 539 p. (In Russ.)

12. Stepanyants M.T. (2009). Islamskii mistitsizm [Islamic Mysticism]. Moscow, Canon+ Publ., 272 p. (In Russ.)

13. Stepanyants M.T. (1987). Filosofskie aspekty sufizma [Philosophical Aspects of Sufism]. Moscow, 192 p. (In Russ.)

14. Frolova E.A. (2010). Arabskaya filosofiya: Proshloe i nastoyashchee [Arabic Philosophy: Past and Present]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Cultures Publ., 464 p. (In Russ.)

15. Astapov S.N. (2009). The reception of Nicolaus Cusanus’ negative dialectics in Russian religious philosophy of the first half of the 20th century. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Severo-Kavkazskii region. Obshchestvennye nauki = Bulletin of Higher Education Institutes. Northern-Caucasus Region. Social Sciences, no. 2 (150), pp. 5-9. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/klsamd

16. Nechiporenko A.V. (2011). Rekonstruktsiya stanovleniya printsipa coincidentia oppsitorum v ramkakh metoda docta ignorantia Nikolaya Kuzanskogo [Reconstruction of the coincidentia oppsitorum principle formation in the context of the docta ignorantia method of Nikolai Kuzansky]. Verbum, no. 13, pp. 102-111. (In Russ.)

17. Opletaeva O.N., Korsakova L.V. (2013). Nikolay Kuzansky and renaissance humanism. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Regionovedenie: filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul’turologiya [The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series 1: Regional Studies: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Political Science, Culturology], no. 2 (118), pp. 17-25. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rfueux

18. Losev A.F. (1978). Estetika Vozrozhdeniya [Renaissance Aesthetics]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 623 p. (In Russ.)

19. Opletaeva O.N. (2007). Kontseptsiya «uchenogo neznaniya» i ee rol’ v formirovanii novoevropeiskoi gnoseologii [The concept of “scientific ignorance” and its role in the formation of new European epistemology]. Kul’turnaya zhizn’ Yuga Rossii = Cultural Studies of Russian South, no. 1 (20), pp. 76-77. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/piogin

20. Kuzanskii N. (1979). Sochineniya: v 2 t. [Works: in 2 vols.]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., vol. 1, 488 p. (In Russ.)

21. Mareeva E.V., Mareev S.N. (2013). Problema myshleniya: sozertsatel’nyi i deyatel’nostnyi podkhod [The Problem of Thinking: Contemplative and Action Approach]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 281 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sumwzh

22. Smagin Yu.E. (2012). Knowledge as power in the philosophy of F. Bacon. Vestnik Leningradskogo universiteta imeni A.S. Pushkina = Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18-24. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/purthv

23. Bacon F. (2020). Novyi organon [New Organon]. Moscow, Urait Publ., 242 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zmmwar

24. Dushin A.V. (2013). Ideya obrazovaniya v empiricheskoi filosofii Frensisa Bekona [The education idea in Francis Bacon’s empirical philosophy]. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya v Rossii [Problems and Prospects of Education Development in Russia], no. 18, pp. 9-13. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rinixp

25. Shcherbakov R.N. (2011). Znanie i mogushchestvo cheloveka sovpadayut: k 450-letiyu Frensisa Bekona [Human knowledge and power coincide: for the 450th anniversary of Francis Bacon]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii nauk = Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 342-346. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nsyssd

26. Dekart R. (2020). Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma [Rules for Guiding the Mind]. Moscow, Urait Publ., 97 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/frhlsl

27. Mudragei N.S. (2007). “Passions of soul” according to Rene Descartes. Filosofskie nauki = Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, no. 10, pp. 139-153. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iccwyv

28. Spinoza B. (2020). Etika [Ethics]. Moscow, Urait Publ., 240 p. (In Russ.)

29. Pivovarov D.V. (2012). B. Spinoza: phylosophy of religion. Vestnik Ural’skogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava = Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law, no. 1 (18), pp. 65-75. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ttgjzv

30. Bodrov A.N., Pakhil’ko A.D. (2018). Divergentnoe myshlenie: filosofsko-pedagogicheskii aspekt [Divergent thinking: philosophical and pedagogical aspect]. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Tendentsii razvitiya obrazovaniya: pedagog, obrazovatel’naya organizatsiya, obshchestvo – 2018» [Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Trends in the Development of Education: Teacher, Educational Organization, Society – 2018”]. Cheboksary, Publishing house “Sreda”, pp. 302-304. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yleigt