Preview

Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities

Advanced search

A sight translation contest as a tool to identify common student difficulties in translating economics texts

https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2023-28-5-1151-1162

Abstract

Relevance. Sight translation of business documents and news is widely used in today’s business communication. Unfortunately, this type of translation is often overlooked in university curricula. Sight translation is seen as a mere step towards simultaneous interpretation and is skipped. However, it is this type of translation that we need to focus on, as a large number of translation errors are reported in real-life situations.

Materials and Methods. We analyzed and aggregated available data from open sources: university website posts about the student contest, surveys of contestants, interviews with organizers and judges, qualitative and quantitative analysis of the most common difficulties (emotional, cognitive and motor challenges) and presented our experience with the organization of the student translation contest at the Moscow Institute of International Relations, Oditsovo Campus.

Results and Discussion. We categorized the typical errors made by the participants. The errors can be purely linguistic, caused by insufficient language skills, and extra-linguistic (emotional, cognitive and motor). The most important reasons for making errors are low stress resistance, lack of attention, insufficient understanding of the subject matter and, as a consequence, poor understanding of the context, insufficient knowledge of special terminology, and missing intra-sentence references.

Conclusion. The research shows that a sight translation contest is an effective tool for identifying and preventing common difficulties that students may have in translating specialized texts.

About the Authors

M. M. Stepanova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Maria M. Stepanova, PhD (Education), Associate Professor of English Language Department

76 Vernadskogo Ave., Moscow, 119454



V. S. Lukyanova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Valentina S. Lukyanova, PhD (Philology), Associate Professor of English Language Department

76 Vernadskogo Ave., Moscow, 119454



References

1. Babenko O.V., Vinnikova M.N., Kurmaeva I.I. (2022). Translation contests as motivation trigger for wouldbe translators. KFU experience. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, no. 75-4, pp. 34-36. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qqmuxu

2. Luk’yanova V.S., Stepanova M.M. (2022). Interpretation contest as an active form of learning and a way to enhance students’ professional potential. Voprosy metodiki prepodavaniya v vuze = Teaching Methodology in Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 99-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.57769/2227-8591.11.3.06, https://elibrary.ru/dlsgau

3. Alekseeva I.S. (2021). Translation competition as diagnostic and didactic tool or lessons of Sensum de Sensu: marking the 20th anniversary of the competition. Issledovaniya yazyka i sovremennoe gumanitarnoe znanie = Language Studies and Modern Humanities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 106-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-830X-2021-3-1-106-115, https://elibrary.ru/lzvvjl

4. Uvarov E.A., Gorbunova A.V. (2023). Development of student’s social intelligence based on the development of emotional flexibility and empathy. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 235-246. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2023-28-2-235-246, https://elibrary.ru/dwvkml

5. James C. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London, New York, Routledge Publ., 1998, 320 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842912

6. Knyazheva E.A. (2010). Assessing the quality of translation: theory and practice. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 190-195. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ndorzh

7. Ivleva A.Yu. (2018). Assessment of professional and academic translation quality: problems and perspectives. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Problemy yazykoznaniya i pedagogiki = Perm National Research Polytechnic University Linguistics and Pedagogy Bulletin, no. 1, pp. 8-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9389/2018.1.1, https://elibrary.ru/wcdlqd

8. Stepanova M.M., Kotlyar Yu.V. (2019). Oshibki v perevodakh kulinarnykh retseptov i menyu s bolgarskogo yazyka na russkii [Errors in translations of culinary recipes and menus from Bulgarian into Russian]. Sbornik materialov 19 Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Aktual’nye problemy lingvistiki, perevodovedeniya, yazykovoi kommunikatsii i lingvodidaktiki» [Proceedings of the 19th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation “Current Problems of Linguistics, Translation Studies, Language Communication and Linguodidactics”]. Krasnoyarsk, pp. 10-12. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oafgbz

9. Chiknaverova K.G. (2018). Analysis of errors at the introductory course of legal English at a university. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika = Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 181- 186. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vodbrz

10. Foster L. (2014). Quality-assessment expectations and quality-assessment reality in educational interpreting. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, vol. 43, pp. 87-102. https://doi.org/10.5842/43-0-207

11. Kurz I. (2001). Conference interpreting: quality in the ears of the user. Meta: Translators’ Journal, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 394-409. https://doi.org/10.7202/003364ar

12. Kalina S. (2005). Quality assurance for interpreting processes. Meta: Translators’ Journal, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 768-784. https://doi.org/10.7202/011017ar

13. Min’yar-Beloruchev R.K. (1999). Kak stat’ perevodchikom? [How to Become an Interpreter?]. Moscow, Gothic Publ., 176 p. (In Russ.)

14. Komissarov V.N. (2002). Sovremennoe perevodovedenie [Modern Translation Studies]. Moscow, 424 p. (In Russ.)

15. Ter-Minasova S.G. (2012). Problems of translation: mission impossible? Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya = Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 9-18. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/pavcul


Review

For citations:


Stepanova M.M., Lukyanova V.S. A sight translation contest as a tool to identify common student difficulties in translating economics texts. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2023;28(5):1151-1162. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2023-28-5-1151-1162

Views: 55


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-0201 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5825 (Online)