PROJECTION OF INDIVIDUAL STYLE DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY OF PEDAGOGICAL ACTIVITY OF HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION LECTURER

The specifics of individual style technology development projection of professional-pedagogical activity of higher educational institution lecutrer is founded. The correspondence of the notions “development” and “formation” is considered. The necessity to use the term “forming development” for realization of the projected technology is founded. It is proved that the necessary effect is reached not by the influence, but by the synergism of interaction between the lecturer and the helping teacher, who creates the conditions for the lecturer to be included in the dynamic activity to achieve the aim. The basic aim of external forming influence is in the transferal of the lecturer and his/her individual style of pedagogical activity in stable regime of self-regulated development of intentive type, connected with effective use of internal resources and the possibilities of environment. The choice of this strategy supposes the appliance to reflexion and self-regulation of the teacher as implementaiton of autonomous personal choice basing on integration of freedom and responsibility and taking new value orientations. The technology of the forming influence is considered from the point of view of synergism as an interaction of two self-organizing systems - “forming, influencing helper” and “changing” (lecturer, post-graduate student), and the higher the efficiency of the projected technology, the more informational interaction of these self-regulating systems is. The process of regulating of each of these systems is implemented due to informational interaction of participants, because each of these systems is the source of organization of the activity and behaviour. The aims and the content of three stages of technology of development of individual style of pedagogical activity of higher educational institution lecturer: analytical-reflexive, constructive-correction and evaluative-stabilizing. Analytical-reflexive stage gives the possibility not only to define the peculiarities of individuality of the lecturer and his real individual style of pedagogical activity, but it promotes the analysis of the existing interaction of the subjects of educational process in the institute. Constructive-correctional forming influence creates the conditions for transmission of individual style of pedagogical activity of the lecturer in unstable state and promotes the choice of the trajectory of further self-regulated development. The implementation of evaluative-stabilizing stage let provide the stable predominance of the urge at lecturer to the fuller use of external and internal possibilities at the change of individual style of pedagogical activity at bifurcate stage of self-regulated development.

university lecturer, individual style, professional-pedagogic activity, forming development, stages of technology, reflexion, self-regulation

1. Макарова Л.Н. Закономерности и принципы развития индивидуального стиля педагогической деятельности преподавателя вуза // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия Гуманитарные науки. Тамбов, 2002. Вып. 1 (25). С. 77-84.

2. Маркова А.К., Никонова А.Я. Психологические особенности индивидуального стиля деятельности учителя // Вопросы психологии. 1987. № 5. С. 40-48.

3. Чудновский В.Э. К проблеме соотношения «внешнего» и «внутреннего» в психологии // Психологический журнал. 1993. Т. 14. № 5. С. 3-12.

4. Исаев И.Ф., Шаршов И.А. Профессионально-творческое саморазвитие личности: восхождение к акме // Сибирский педагогический журнал. 2009. № 3. С. 43-54.

5. Философский словарь / под ред. И.Т. Фролова. М., 1987.

6. Подымова Л.С. Психолого-педагогическая инноватика: личностный аспект. М., 2012.

7. Степанов С.Ю., Похмелкина Г.Ф., Колошина Т.Ю., Фролова Т.В. Принципы рефлексивной психологии педагогического творчества // Вопросы психологии. 1991. № 5. С. 5-16.

8. Ильин Е.П. Эмоции и чувства. СПб., 2007.

9. Бодалев А.А. Акмеология как учебная и научная дисциплина. М., 1993.

10. Ильин Е.П. Мотивация и мотивы. СПб., 2002.

11. Майданов А.С. Методология научного творчества. М., 2008.