Preview

Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities

Advanced search

Diagnostical tools to evaluate student’s creative thinking development

https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2019-24-179-7-19

Abstract

We show the data of diagnostic research, main aim is to analyze the development level of structural components of students creative thinking. Creative thinking is interpreted as a professionally-oriented thinking characterized by the ability to generate a lot of original ideas in unregulated conditions of activity, developed verbal creativity and insight, a high level of reflection, inquisitiveness, imagination, self-control of emotional states. We consider it as the most important factor influencing personal and professional self-change of students - future psychologists. We reveal the indicators of creative thinking development and the diagnostic tools for their evaluation are substantiated, identify and analyze the main problem areas in the development of creative thinking of students (low level of verbal activity, lack of curiosity, lack of understanding of the need for further work on the development of imagination). Using diagnosis we reveal the relationship between the individual psychological characteristics of the personality of students-psychologists and their predominant types of thinking: subject, symbolic, symbolic and imaginative. We obtain the analysis results using a five-factor personal questionnaire by R. McCrae and P. Costa which allows to make a personal portrait of the subjects by many factors: extra - version - introversion, attachment - isolation, self-control - impulsiveness, emotional stability-instability, expressiveness-practicality. We reveal the difficulties in the development of creative thinking, which meet students with a focus on the prevalence of one of the indicators in a particular pair. We present the factor analysis results of the obtained data carried out by principal component analysis with the construction of the correlation matrix and subsequent orthogonal rotation. Correlation analysis showed that the students' scale of creativity correlates with such indicators as imagination, creative thinking, activity - passivity, domination - submission, manifestation - avoidance of guilt, extroversion - introversion, credulity - suspicion, curiosity - conservatism, curiosity - realism, activity component. The results of the study can be used in the educational programs development aimed at the students’ creativity development and personal and professional competencies formation of future psychologists in high school.

About the Authors

L. N. Makarova
Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin
Russian Federation


S. V. Rozhkova
Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin
Russian Federation


References

1. Шевырев А.В., Михеев В.А., Федотова М.А. Системная аналитика и креативное мышление как ключевые когнитивные технологии образования будущего // Перспективы развития современного образования: от дошкольного до высшего: в 2 ч. / отв. ред. С.Г. Воровщиков, О.А. Шклярова. М.: МПГУ, 2017. Ч. 1. С. 35-43.

2. Боровинская Д.Н. О некоторых методологических проблемах исследования креативного мышления как процесса // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2017. № 38. С. 7-14.

3. Панова Е.С. Развитие креативного мышления: от проблемы к инновационному решению. Москва; Берлин: Директ-Медиа, 2016. 197 с.

4. Шевченко Н.Ю., Лебедева Ю.В., Неумоина Н.Г., Корбакова Т.В. Формирование креативного мышления у студентов высшего образования // Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2014. № 11-4. С. 658-662.

5. Копытова Н.Е., Макарова Л.Н. Профессиональные стандарты и их роль при проектировании основных образовательных программ подготовки педагогов // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2017. Т. 22. № 2 (166). С. 55-62. DOI 10.20310/1810-0201-2017-22-2(166)-55-62.

6. Шаршов И.А. Система критериев, показателей и уровней процесса профессионально-творческого саморазвития субъектов в вузе // Психолого-педагогический журнал Гаудеамус. 2010. Т. 1. № 15. С. 26-36.

7. Сиротюк А.С. Диагностика одаренности. М.: Директ-Медиа, 2014. 1229 с.

8. Ильин Е.П. Психология творчества, креативности, одаренности. СПб.: Питер, 2009. 448 с.

9. Батаршев А.В. Диагностика темперамента и характера. СПб.: Питер, 2016. 368 с.

10. Рожкова С.В. Индивидуально-психологические особенности студентов-психологов с разным типом мышления // Личностное и профессиональное развитие будущего специалиста / отв. ред. И.А. Шаршов, Л.Н. Макарова. Тамбов: Изд. дом ТГУ им. Г.Р. Державина, 2017. С. 37-42.


Review

For citations:


Makarova L.N., Rozhkova S.V. Diagnostical tools to evaluate student’s creative thinking development. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2019;24(179):7-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2019-24-179-7-19

Views: 51


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-0201 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5825 (Online)