“My report will be a memory of something that stands out very vividly in my memory...” (Stanislav Chechek and his activities in the “Society of Participants of the Volga Movement of 1918”)

Importance. The activities of the “Society of Participants of the Volga Movement of 1918” are considered and an analysis of its activities as a society for preserving the memory of emigrants about the events of the Civil War in the Volga region is given. The relevance of the study lies in the fact that the basis of our sample is the role of its chairman Stanislav Chechek, an active participant in military operations in the Volga region. Particular attention is paid to his work “From Penza to the Urals,” which is created on the basis of a report for members of the Society. This document is analyzed for the first time, despite its availability.

Materials and Methods. The research materials are data on the “Society of the Volga Movement of 1918”, stored in the funds of the State Archive of the Russian Federation. The work uses a historical-systemic method, which allows us to consider the social activities of S. Chechek and his speech as the highest point in the activities of society. The principles of historicism and objectivism make it possible to analyze the main aspects of the activities of the Society and S. Chechek.

Results and Discussion. Based on the study of archival materials and analysis of the text of S. Chechek’s work “From Penza to the Urals”, the public, educational and publication activities of the society, as well as a set of problems that it faced, are considered. Special attention is paid to the activities of his supervisor, through the prism of whose report they are able to rethink his role and significance for the events of the Civil War in Russia.

Conclusion. Despite the relatively short period of work, the organization “Society of the Volga Movement of 1918” is able to form a fund of unique profiles of participants in the Civil War, documents and materials that are available to researchers.

1. Serapionova E.P. (2013). Obshchestvo uchastnikov Volzhskogo dvizheniya v 1918 g. [The Society of participants of the Volga movement in 1918]. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsia «Russkoe zarubezh’e i slavyanskii mir» [International Scientific Conference “The Russian Diaspora and the Slavic world”]. Belgrade, Slavisticheskoe soobshchestvo Serbii Publ., pp. 121-129. (In Russ.)

2. Baklanov V.I. (2023). On the role of the Czechoslovak corps in the expansion of the civil war in Russia. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = Izvestiya of Saratov University. History. International Relations, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 136-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-4907-2023-23-1-136-139, https://elibrary.ru/aaxhww

3. Mironov V.V., Sal’nikov P.Eh. (2022). Czech-slovak corps and the bolsheviks in the spring of 1918. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review: Series Humanities, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1446-1457. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2022-27-6-1446-1457, https://elibrary.ru/cjnela

4. Mironov V.V., Sal’nikov P.Eh. (2023). Czech-slovak corps in the summer of 1918. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review: Series Humanities, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 689-702. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2023-28-3-689-702, https://elibrary.ru/tvufkf

5. Beschastnov N.N. (2022). The problem of evacuation of the Czechoslovak corps and the United States. Sbornil statei 10 Vserossijskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Aktual’nye problemy istorii, politiki i prava» [Collection of Articles of 10th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference “Current Problems of History, Politics and Law”]. Penza, Penza State Agrarian University Publ., pp. 16-19. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gkembq

6. Beschastnov N.N. (2021). William Graves on the mutiny of the Czechoslovak corps. Materialy Vserossijsoi nauchno-praktichesoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 100-letiyu okonchaniya Grazhdanskoi voiny i interventsii na Dal’nem Vostoke «Istoriya Grazhdanskoi voiny na Dal’nem Vostoke i istoriya russkoi ehmigratsii» [Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of the Civil War End and Intervention in the Far East “The History of the Civil War in the Far East and the History of Russian Emigration”]. Blagoveshchensk, Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University Publ., pp. 30-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48344/BSPU.2021.23.46.005, https://elibrary.ru/snlwjw

7. Fes’kova E.P. (2022). The French military mission in Siberia and the evacuation of the Czechoslovak army in 1919. Izvestiya Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Izvestia of Smolensk State University, no. 2 (58), pp. 142-156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2022-58-2-142-156, https://elibrary.ru/lhpyws

8. Medek R. (1927). Anabase. Praha, Josef Vilimek Publ., 587 S. (In Czech)

9. Kratochvil J. (1922). Cesta revoluce (československé legie v Rusku). Praha, Čin Publ., 674 S. (In Czech)

10. Bobrakov-Timoshkin A. (2008). Proekt «Chekhoslovakiya». Konflikt ideologii v Pervoi Chekhoslovatskoi respublike (1918–1938 gg.) [The Czechoslovakia Project. The Conflict of Ideologies in the First Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938)]. Moscow, New Literature Observer Publ., 224 p. (In Russ.)

11. Langer F. (2018). Za chuzhoi gorod. Periferiya: dramaturgiya, proza, memuary [For a Strange City. Periphery: Drama, Prose, Memoirs]. St. Petersburg, N.I. Novikov Publ., Kontrast Publ., pp. 285-329. (In Russ.)

12. Langer F. (1994). Železný vlk (Přiběhý znašíanabáze). Praha, Mladafronta Publ., 204 p. (In Czech)

13. Vasil’chenko M.A., Zakharov A.M. (2021). “A Foreign City”: Dr. František Langer and the battles for Kazan in August–September 1918. Genesis: Istoricheskie issledovaniya [Genesis: Historical Research], no. 4, pp. 131-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-868X.2021.4.35379, https://elibrary.ru/fhovnr

14. Vasil’chenko M.A., Panin E.V. (2020). The Czechoslovak corps and anti-bolshevik forces of the Volga region: key aspects of interaction. Manuskript = Manuscript, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 26-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2020.7.4, https://elibrary.ru/lndqsw

15. Mel’gunov S.P. (2005). Tragediya admirala Kolchaka: iz istorii grazhdanskoi voiny na Volge, Urale i v Sibiri: v 2 kn. [The Tragedy of Admiral Kolchak: from the History of the Civil War on the Volga, the Urals and Siberia: in 2 books]. Moscow, Airis Press, 586 p. (In Russ.)

16. Chechek S. (1928). Ot Penzy do Urala [From Penza to the Urals]. Volya naroda (Praga) [The Will of the People (Prague)], no. 8-9, pp. 246-265. (In Russ.)

17. Fidler J. (1999). Generálové legionáři. Brno, Books Publ., 356 S. (In Czech)

18. Valiakhmetov A.N. (2020). Kazan and Kazan citizens in 1918 in the description of the Czechoslovak legionary J. Mechura. Ehkho vekov = Echo of Centuries, no. 3, pp. 49-54. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/tiildh

19. Hodik M., Landa P. (2006). Švejk: fikce a fakta. Praha, Nasevojsko Publ., 215 S. (In Czech)