INDIVIDUALITY AND TYPOLOGY OF A LECTURER OF HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION: INTERACTABILITY

A lecturer of higher educational institution as a subject of pedagogy activity from the position of acmeological approach is considered. The importance of subjective development of the lecturer who is able to realize self-regulation and self-development in the process of personal-professional establishment is analyzed. It is justified that the lecturer’s activity appear in conflict resolution between highly-organized life system which he/she presents (as integrated individuality) and objective conditions of professional activities. Constructiveness of professional-pedagogic activity is inseparable from his/her subjective activity, due to which the lecturer realizes himself as a personality. It is necessary to create conditions, due or contrary to which the lecturer decides to be active and independent. The relevance of interconnection problem between individual-mental differences in lecturers of higher educational institution and corresponding personality type is founded. The difficulties, appearing while revealing individual-typological peculiarities of higher educational institution lecturer are analyzed in detail. The existing strategies of revealing types of personality: constitutional-anthropometric, factorial, block, socially-centered, motivational-dynamic, their advantages and limits are revealed. The notion “type of lecturer’s individuality” is founded. The use of integral individuality theory for revealing individual-typological peculiarities of a lecturer of higher educational institution is considered.

преподаватель вуза, индивидуальность, индивидуально-типологические особенности, субъект профессиональной деятельности, психологические различия, индивидуально-типо-логический подход, акмеология, lecturer of higher educational institution, individuality, individual-typological peculiarities, subject of professional activity, psychological differences, individual-typological approach, acmeology

1. Харченко Л.Н. Преподаватель современного вуза: компетентностная модель. М., 2014.

2. Макарова Л.Н. Развитие стиля педагогической деятельности преподавателя вуза // Педагогика. 2005. № 6. С. 72-80.

3. Абульханова-Славская К.А. Стратегия жизни. М., 1991.

4. Подымова Л.С. Психолого-педагогическая инноватика. Личностный аспект. М., 2012.

5. Русалов В.М. О природе темперамента // Вопросы психологии. 1985. № 1. С. 20-26.

6. Платонов К.К. Структура и развитие личности. М., 1986.

7. Мерлин В.С. Очерк интегрального исследования индивидуальности. М., 1986.

8. Никитюк Б.А. Психологическая антропология как пограничная область антропологии и психологии // Новости спортивной и медицинской антропологии. М., 1990.

9. Небылицын В.Д. Психофизиологические исследования индивидуальных различий. М., 1976.

10. Теплов Б.М. Проблемы индивидуальных различий. М., 1961.

11. Белоус В.В. Проблемы интегрального исследования индивидуальности. Пермь, 1981.

12. Резвицкий И.И. Личность. Индивидуальность. Общество. М., 1984.