Preview

Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities

Advanced search

Land dispute of agricultural cooperatives in the early 1920s: growing pains or indicator of peasantization

https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-6-1773-1787

Abstract

Importance. The purpose of the study is to highlight the problem of economic self-identification of the peasantry at the beginning of the 1920s recovery period. The main emphasis is placed on the land conflict use in the agricultural environment as an economic and social consolidation indicator of the peasantry. Research hypothesis: in the survival strategy of the peasant community, the traditional economic usefulness (functionality) restoration was a physical and social self-preservation guarantee. Participation in collective forms of management acted as a “corporate elevator” of economic recovery with the prospect of reviving the individual peasant economy, which allows the use of the term okrestyanivaniye. Land conflict in this case is a traditional way of ensuring the agricultural community functionality, regardless of its organizational form (family, community, collective). The empirical basis of the study is the materials of the land dispute between the Troekurovskaya volost of the Lebedyansky district artels of the Tambov province.
Materials and Methods. The source base of the study is made up of documents from the Regional state Institution “State Archive of the Lipetsk Region” (SALR), including correspondence from provincial and county land departments and commissions, reports and correspondence of surveyors with land authorities, plans, land plots, acts, statements, complaints from Lebedyansky County artels’ representatives. Most of the submitted documents are being put into circulation for the first time. Statistical and reporting materials of the Tambov provincial Executive Committee, provincial and county government bodies meetings are also used in the research process. A systematic approach, general scientific and historical research methods are used.
Results and Discussion. The dynamics analysis of collective construction in the Tambov province is conducted, the land management results of the Lebedyansky district artels in the first half of the 1920s are revealed. Regional features of the peasant attitude to socialist forms of management are revealed. The evolution of the inter-artel land dispute is considered: causes, motivation, conflict course, parties’ arguments and land authorities reaction of the Tambov province and Lebedyansky district. Based on the artels’ evidentiary documents analysis, the economic and social components of the land dispute are revealed.
Conclusion. The goal-setting of border groups of peasants to participate in artel forms of farming is determined. Based on the analysis of the dynamics of the land conflict, a conclusion is made about the desire of farmers in the conditions of the economic crisis of the beginning of the recovery period to use collective forms to ensure economic, social and physical survival, as a basis for the subsequent revival of individual farming. The term peasantization is used in relation to the designated process

About the Author

E. V. Gatilov
Lipetsk State Technical University
Russian Federation

Eduard V. Gatilov, Cand. Sci. (History), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of History, Theory of State and Law Department

30 Moskovskaya St., Lipetsk, 398042



References

1. Vyguzov A.A. (2023). On the reasons for joining collective farms in 1918–1928: between enthusiasm and economic interests (by the materials of the Tambov province). Istoriya: Fakty i simvoly = History: Facts and Symbols, no. 3 (36), pp. 8-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24888/2410-4205-2023-36-3-8-18, https://elibrary.ru/taitvu

2. Gatilov E.V. (2019). The formation of collective forms of economic entity in yelets county of Orel province in 1917–1919. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya = Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. History, Political Science, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 323-336. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18413/2075-4458-2019-46-2-323-336, https://elibrary.ru/kddavw

3. Gatilov E.V. (2021). Land reform and behavioral practices of the chernozem peasantry. 1920–1923 (on the example of the Teshevskaya volost of the Zadonsky district of the Voronezh province). Materialy Vserossiyskoi nauchnoi konferentsii «Soyuz Sovetskikh Sotsialisticheskikh respublik kak istoriko-kul’turnyi fenomen» = Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference “The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics as a Historical and Cultural Phenomenon”. Elets, Bunin Yelets State University Publ., pp. 27-36. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wvuubw

4. Vyguzov A.A., Nikolashin V.P. (2023). Models and forms of agricultural production and economic transformations of the Russian countryside (16th – first third of the 20th century). Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 462-471. https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2023-28-2-462-471, https://elibrary.ru/bohcvz

5. Vyguzov A.A. (2023). Features of the development of collective farms in the reconstructive period of the NEP (on the example of the Ingavinsky parish of the Kirsanovsky district of the Tambov province). Materialy 5 Vserossiyskoi nauchnoi konferentsii (pamyati professora V.M. Vazhinskogo) «Problemy agrarnoi istorii Rossii» = Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference (in memory of Professor V.M. Vazhinsky) “Problems of the Agrarian History of Russia”. Lipetsk, Lipetsk State Pedagogical P. Semenov- Tyan-Shansky University Publ., pp. 144-149. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/liomcs

6. Bezgin V.B., Nikolashin V.P. (2019). The poor as a social basis of the state in the course of agrarian reforms of t he e nd o f t he 1 920s – the b eginning o f t he 1 930s ( by t he materials o f t he C entral B lack E arth r egion). Manuskript = Manuscript, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 24-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2019.12.3, https://elibrary.ru/xhljux

7. Nikolashin V.P., Strekalova N.V. (2023). On peculiarities of studying the collective farms activities in the days of the NEP on the example of the Tambov gubernia: the 1920s. Vestnik arkhivista = Herald of an Archivist, vol. 4, pp. 1173-1184. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2023-4-1173-1184, https://elibrary.ru/hcymyo

8. Vyguzov A.A. (2023). Collective farms of Tambov governorate during the period of new economic policy: main published and archival sources. Vestnik Soveta molodykh uchenykh Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrotekhnologicheskogo universiteta imeni P.A. Kostycheva, no. 1 (17), pp. 21-24. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jvxsfp

9. Averin N.V. (2021). Provisions situation in the Tambov governorate in the early 1918. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review: Series Humanities, vol. 26, no. 192, pp. 209-215. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2021-26-192-209-215, https://elibrary.ru/voohvj

10. Zhirov N.A., Kanishchev V.V. (2020). The impact of the migrations on the everyday life of the peasant population of the Orel and Tambov gubernias in the early XX century. Ezhegodnik po Agrarnoi Istorii Vostochnoi Evropy, no. 1, pp. 91-99. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/idntye

11. Petrishina I.D. (2023). Krest’yanskoe khozyaistvo Chernozemnogo tsentra v gody novoi ekonomicheskoi politiki: 1921–1929 gg. Moscow, Probel-2000 Publ., 288 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/edkvpv

12. Petrishina I.D. (2023). Peasant cooperatives of the Tambov governorate in the first half of the 1920s. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review: Series Humanities, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 963-974. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2023-28-4-963-974, https://elibrary.ru/favjrh

13. Oblitsov M.A. (2019). The use of quantitative methods in studying the professional activities of the population of the Northern districts of the Tambov province on the eve of the uprising of 1920–1921. Sbornik tezisov dokladov «Tret’ya zimnyaya shkola po gumanitarnoi informatike» = Collection of Abstracts “The Third Winter School in Humanitarian Informatics”. Kaliningrad, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Publ., pp. 31-36. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qyxlus

14. Babaev A.V., Petrishina I.D. (2023). The mood of the peasantry in connection with the aggravation of the food issue in the late 1920s. Materialy 5 Vserossiyskoi nauchnoi konferentsii (pamyati professora V.M. Vazhinskogo) «Problemy agrarnoi istorii Rossii» = Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference (in memory of Professor V.M. Vazhinsky) “Problems of the Agrarian History of Russia”. Lipetsk, Lipetsk State Pedagogical P. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky University Publ., pp. 134-143. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/fvjllw

15. Ippolitov V.A. (2023). Impact of famine of 1924–1925 on social and political mood of peasantry in Tambov province. Nauchnyi dialog = Scientific Dialogue, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 336-362. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-2-336-362, https://elibrary.ru/ftzxsm

16. Nikolashin V.P. (2019). Land conflicts in the initial period of Soviet regime: from the confrontation of communities to the fight of peasants with collective economies and poor peasant’s committees. Istoriya: fakty i simvoly = History: Facts and Symbols, no. 3 (20), pp. 116-125. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24888/2410-4205-2019-20-3-116-125, https://elibrary.ru/whilin


Review

For citations:


Gatilov E.V. Land dispute of agricultural cooperatives in the early 1920s: growing pains or indicator of peasantization. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2024;29(6):1773-1787. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-6-1773-1787

Views: 72


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-0201 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5825 (Online)