Pedagogical grammar of the Russian language in onomastic and cognitive aspects

The main features of pedagogical grammar are outlined, which make it possible to use the educational potential of proper names in teaching the Russian language to Uzbek students, to carry out educational activities – to expand the horizons and range of onomastic knowledge, to promote the formation of onomastic culture. It is proved that the existing anthropocentric model in the system of modern philological education should include the pedagogical aspects of onomastics. The structure of obligatory knowledge about the category of masculine and feminine nouns in the Russian language is associated with the designation of persons of different sexes, which reflects one of the principles of the pedagogical description of the Russian language – the inclusion of maximum information that helps memorize the word and reveal the cultural identity of the Russian language, which , which is a linguistic picture of the world. Attention is focused on the fact that the pedagogical description of onomastic vocabulary based on the main cognitive function of the language makes it possible to take into account the process of categorization, in which the formatting of the linguistic status of the class of “feminitives”, the content category of feminine nouns as new objects of reality takes place, which is not yet focused on educational description of these language formations in textbooks for universities and schools of secondary general education with Uzbek and other languages of instruction. It is substantiated that from the standpoint of pedagogical grammar, knowledge about the category of feminine nouns as a derived Russian word should be formed as secondary new knowledge, and primary knowledge associated with knowledge of the generating word should be included in the interpretation of feminitives, which corresponds to the idea of expanding knowledge about the Russian language.

1. Golovanova E.I. (2013). Kategoriya roda kak kognitivnaya matritsa [The category of gender as a cognitive matrix]. Chelyabinskii gumanitarii = Chelyabinsk Humanitarian, no. 3 (24), pp. 25-30. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rpdgrl

2. Boldyrev N.N. (2006). Linguistic categories as a format of knowledge. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki = Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 2 (7), pp. 5-22. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/iiqxrh

3. Shcherbak A.S. (2020). Onomastic consciousness as a cognitive-language system. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka = Cognitive Studies of Language, no. 3 (42), pp. 301-304. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ffvvys

4. Shchelokova A.A. (2020). Onomastic consciousness as a cognitive-language system. Neofilologiya = Neophilology, vol. 6, no. 23, pp. 496-502. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2020-6-23-496-502, https://elibrary.ru/fcjwki

5. Ovchinnikova E.V., Kuzmina V.M. (2019). Influence of gender stereotypes on the determination of the gender of nouns by native Chinese students. In: Ivanova M.A. (executive ed.). Materialy 9 Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Rossiya i Kitai: istoriya i perspektivy sotrudnichestva» [Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Russia and China: History and Prospects of Cooperation”]. Blagoveshchensk, Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University Publ., pp. 58-63. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jfdhyo

6. Tomchani L.V. (2017). Tipologicheskie kontrasty russkogo i uzbekskikh yazykov [Typological contrasts of Russian and Uzbek languages]. Molodoi uchenyi [Young Scientist], no. 14 (148), pp. 736-738. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yjwtwn