Axiological linguadidactics in the system of professional linguistic education

Importance. An urgent problem related to the value-centered aspects of teacher’s activities and the content of training programs is considered. The purpose of the research is to substantiate the object-subject area of axiological linguadidactics as a modern scientific and methodological field.

Materials and Methods. The main research methods used were: a critical analysis of modern scientific research in the field of linguadidactics, axiology, pedagogy, an analysis of subject-practical and educational activities in the field of teaching foreign languages and a generalization of the results obtained in the format of the goals and objectives of the axiological approach to teaching foreign languages.

Results and Discussion. The research identified the object and subject area of axiological linguadidactics as an autonomous scientific and methodological field and clarified the purpose of this branch in solving the problems of modern linguistic education. The axiological orientation of modern linguadidactics as a component of methodological science is substantiated. The research focused on the axiological approach developed within the framework of modern axiological linguadidactics, highlighted the main dominants and differences from communicative and intercultural approaches, at the same time, identified its origins.

Conclusion. As a result of achieving the set research goal, conclusions were drawn about the naturalness and necessity of an axiological reorientation of linguadidactics and the "consequences" of such a transformation.

1. Galskova N.D., Nikitenko Z.N., Treshina I.V. (2023). Value-semantic priorities of students – future teachers of foreign languages in the conditions of digitalization of education. Prepodavatel’ XXI vek, no. 1-1, pp. 30- 39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31862/2073-9613-2023-1-30-39, https://elibrary.ru/lvtwfu

2. Khaleeva I.I. (1989). Theory Fundamentals of Teaching Understanding of Foreign Language Speech (Translator Training). Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 238 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/lbjqjn

3. Hellmich H. (1980). Die Didaktik des Fremdsprachenunterrichts als integrative Wissenschaftsdisziplin. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, H. 4, S. 218-224. (In German)

4. Strauss D. (1984). Didaktik und Methodik. Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Eine Einführung. Berlin, München, Langenscheidt, 257 S. (In German)

5. Slastenin V.A. (2008). Pedagogy. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 566 p. (In Russ.)

6. Chizhakova G.I., Potapova N.I. (1999). Values in Education and Education as a Value. Krasnoyarsk, 339 p. https://elibrary.ru/twfzbh

7. Baryshnikov N.V. (2022). Teaching foreign languages: risks and ways to eliminate them. Formirovanie inoyazychnykh kompetentsii. Pyatigorsk, Pyatigorsk State University Publ., pp. 37-50. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/gdvnwn

8. Safonova V.V. (1991). A Sociocultural Approach to Teaching Foreign Languages. Moscow, 311 p. (In Russ.)

9. Sysoyev P.V. (2003). The Concept of Linguistic Multicultural Education: (Based on the Material of Cultural Studies in the USA). Moscow, Evroshkola Publ., 406 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qrhcgl

10. Tareva E.G. (2001). Formation of a rational style of educational activities in university students: theory and technology. Irkutsk, 200 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vlggap

11. Furmanova V.P. (2009). Intercultural Communication in the Theory and Practice of Teaching Foreign Languages at the University. Saransk, 164 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qutoeb

12. Galskova N.D., Nikitenko Z.N. (2024). Foreign language teacher in the sovereign system of national education. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole = Foreign Languages at School, no. 7, pp. 5-11. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oowwfz

13. Nikitenko Z.N. (2020). A Foreign Language in Elementary School. Theory and Practice. Moscow, FLINTA Publ., 324 p. (In Russ.)

14. Sherkovin Yu.A. (1973). Psychological Problems of Mass Information Processes. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 215 p. (In Russ.)

15. Arutyunyan Yu.V. (1992). Russian Ethnosociological Essays. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 461 p. (In Russ.)