Scientific and educational discourse in a process of a student foreign language education

Importance. The continuity and intensity of the society development process is determined by a person’s need for socialization. At the present stage of its existence, social institutions are directly connected not only with the communication process, but also with certain areas of scientific knowledge. However, detailed descriptions of new types of discourse that have arisen as a result of mutual integration are rare. Consequently, such precedents need to be studied in detail and the definition of characteristic features. The purpose of the study is to characterize the scientific and educational type of discourse in the process of teaching a foreign language and to substantiate its methodical potential.

Materials and methods. With the use of theoretical analysis of scientific and methodical literature, systematization of conceptual approaches to the definition of the term “discourse” and comparative analysis of available interpretations, a characteristic of scientific and educational discourse is developed and its methodical potential is theoretically substantiated.

Results and Discussion. The author’s definition of the term “discourse” is proposed, which means the process of speech communication in an institutionalized context between communicants with a set of status-role models. The author’s definition of the term “scientific and educational discourse” is also proposed as a complex, complex and multi-layered system of acts of scientific communication that contributes to the formation of skills and abilities necessary for socialization, structurally correlated with a certain social institution. The author’s characteristic of scientific and educational discourse is described and developed.

Conclusion. The synergy of scientific and educational types of discourse in the foreign language teaching process contributes to the successful socialization of the student, the acquisition of foreign language communicative competence and can also exist in the structural formation of any social institution, influencing the communists who are in the given status-role models.

1. Gasparov B.M. (1996). Yazyk, pamyat’, obraz: Lingvistika yazykovogo sushchestvovaniya [Language, Memory, Image: Linguistics of Landuage Existence]. Moscow, 351 p. (In Russ.)

2. Karasik V.I. (2002). Yazykovoi krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 477 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ugqamp

3. Deik van T.A. (1988). Strategii ponimaniya svyaznogo teksta [Strategies for understanding a coherent text]. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike [New in Foreign Linguistics]. Moscow, issue 23, pp. 153-161 (In Russ.)

4. Dem’yankov V.Z. (2005). Tekst i diskurs kak terminy i kak slova obydennogo yazyka [Text and discourse as terms and as words of daily vocabulary]. In: Toporov V.N. (executive ed.). Yazyk. Lichnost’. Tekst [Language. Personality. Text]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic cultures Publ., pp. 34-55 (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/scefkf

5. Benvenist E. (1974). Obshchaya lingvistika [General Linguistics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 446 p. (In Russ.)

6. Bogdanov V.V. (1993). Tekst i tekstovoe obshchenie [Text and Text Communication]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publ., 67 p. (In Russ.)

7. Nikolaeva T.M. (1978). Kratkii slovar’ terminov lingvistiki [A short dictionary of linguistics terms]. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike [New in Foreign Linguistics], no. 8, pp. 467-471 (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/srveef

8. Orlov G.A. (1991). Sovremennaya angliiskaya rech’ [Modern English Speech]. Moscow, High School Publ., 238 p. (In Russ.)

9. Vinogradov S.I. (1996). Normativnyi i kommunikativno-pragmaticheskii aspekty kul’tury rechi [Normative and communicative-pragmatic aspects of speech culture]. Kul’tura russkoi rechi i effektivnost’ obshcheniya [Culture of Russian Speech and Effectiveness of Communication]. Moscow, pp. 121-152. (In Russ.)

10. Kibrik A.A. (1994). Kognitivnye issledovaniya po diskursu [Cognitive research on discourse]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya = Voprosy Jazykoznanija, no. 5, pp. 126-139. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yrnjvr

11. Habermas J. (1989). Erläuterungen zum Begriff des kommunikativen Handelns. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 3. Aufl. Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp Verl., S. 571-606. (In Ger.)

12. Potter J., Wetherell M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London, Sage Publications Ltd., 256 p.

13. Fuko M. (1996). Arkheologiya znaniya [Archaeology of Knowledge]. Kiev, Nika-Tsentr Publ., 208 p. (In Russ.)

14. Karasik V.I. (2000). O tipakh diskursa [About the types of discourse]. Yazykovaya lichnost’: institutsional’nyi i personal’nyi diskurs [Linguistic Personality: Institutional and Personal Discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., pp. 5-20. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vwhliz

15. Sheigal E. I. (2000). Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of Political Discourse]. Moscow, Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 367 p. (In Russ.)

16. Kolesnikova I.A. (2007). Kommunikativnaya deyatel’nost’ pedagoga [Communicative Activity of a Teacher]. Moscow, 328 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qvlddf

17. Robotova A.S. (2008). Sovremennyi pedagogicheskii diskurs [Modern pedagogical discourse]. Vestnik Gertsenovskogo universiteta [Herzen University Bulletin], no. 12 (62), pp. 19-25. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/nszckl

18. Ezhova T.V. (2006). To the problem of studying of pedagogical discurs. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, no. 2-1 (52), pp. 52-56. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jvgsff

19. Osipova S.I., Fomina E.I. (2012). Diskurs kak ob”ekt pedagogicheskogo analiza [Discourse as an object of pedagogical analysis]. Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal = Siberian Pedagogical Journal, no. 3, pp. 9-12. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/paywml

20. Suvorova S.L. (2012). Phenomenology of researching the notions “discourse” and “pedagogical discourse”. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Obrazovanie. Pedagogicheskie nauki = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Education. Educational Sciences, no. 4 (263), pp. 84-87. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/oxrfff

21. Ostrazhkova N.S. (2004). Obuchenie ponimaniyu soderzhatel’nogo komponenta pedagogicheskogo diskursa lektsii: Angliiskii yazyk, yazykovoi vuz: avtoref. dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Teaching to Understand the Content Component of Lecture Pedagogical Discourse: English, Language University. PhD (Education) diss. abstr.]. Tambov, 18 p. (In Russ.)

22. Kakzanova E.M. (2009). Lingvokognitivnye i kul’turologicheskie osobennosti nauchno-matematicheskogo teksta [Linguocognitive and Culturological Features of Scientific and Mathematical text]. Moscow, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 163 p. (In Russ.)

23. Zharov S.N. (2019). Educational discourse as unity of personality training and formation (history and modernity). Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Problems of Higher Education, no. 4, pp. 12-19. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xwfcct

24. Dronov I.S. (2020). Types of institutional discourse in a foreign language teaching. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 25, no. 187, pp. 29-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2020-25-187-29-36 , https://elibrary.ru/ayqqcd

25. Dronov I.S. (2021). Discursive space of educational environment of the university. Neofilologiya = Neophilology, vol. 7, no. 26, pp. 335-344. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-26-335-344, https://elibrary.ru/prjdbf

26. Smirnova N.V. (2015). Fostering academic literacy and academic writing in university: from theory to practice. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, no. 6, pp. 58-64. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/udqzxh