Rethinking E. Said’s “Orientalism” in modern Western and Russian scientific discourse
https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2022-27-5-1352-1364
Abstract
We consider the perception of the orientalist concept formulated by E. Said in modern Western and Russian science. The key works that have been published over the past 10-15 years are analyzed, inasmuch as the thirty years that have passed since the publication of E. Said’s monograph is a sufficient period for rethinking both the main postulates of his book and critical remarks addressed to it. It is concluded that the debate in the Western scientific community, caused by the publication of “Orientalism” is still mainly focused on the personality of the author himself, and sometimes on the opposition to his contemporary, the American historian and orientalist Bernard Lewis. It is emphasized that after the death of E. Said, the revisionist-minded part of the American and British oriental schools received a new reason to criticize not only “Orientalism”, but also the author himself in order to forget the work, which became the starting point for many Western orientalists to revise their attitude to the object of study. As for Russian Oriental studies, the research of orientalism in the humanities in Russia continues, despite the time that has passed since the publication of the Russian translation of the book by E. Said, and the understanding of the image of the “other” fits into the global trend of the discourse of orientalism, although with some specific features associated with the historical past of Russia.
Supporting agencies: The work was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 20-18-00374 “Imperial Mediterranean: Models, Discourses and Practices of Imperialism from Antiquity to Early Modern Times”.
About the Author
M. S. Chistalev
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mark S. Chistalev, Candidate of History, Research Scholar of Research Laboratory of History of the Ancient World and the Middle Ages Department
23 Gagarin Avе., Nizhny Novgorod 603022
References
1. Huntington S.P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, Simon and Schuster Publ., 2011, 368 p.
2. Rockmore T. Before and After 9/11. A Philosophical Examination of Globalization, Terror, and History. New York, Continuum Publ., 2011, 194 p.
3. Kramer M.S. The War on Error: Israel, Islam, and the Middle East. London, Routledge Publ., 2017, 342 p.
4. Lewis B. Islam and the West. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993. 217 p.
5. Lewis B. From Babel to Dragomans: Interpreting the Middle East. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004. 456 p.
6. Huggan G. (Not) reading Orientalism. Research in African Literatures, 2005, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 124-136.
7. Spanos W.V. The Legacy of Edward W. Said. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 2009. 288 p.
8. Irwine R. For Lust for Knowing: The Orientalists and their Enemies. London, Allen Lane Publ., 2006, 409 p.
9. Ibn Warraq. Defending the West: a Critique of Edward Said's Orientalism. Amherst, Prometheus Books Publ., 2009, 556 p.
10. Said E.W. Kul’tura i imperialism [Culture and Imperialism]. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal Publ., 2012, 733 p.
11. Rung E.V. Predstavleniye persov kak varvarov v grecheskoy literaturnoy traditsii V v. do n. e. [The representation of the Persians as barbarians in the Greek literary tradition of the 5th century BC]. MNEMON: issledovaniya i publikatsii po istorii antichnogo mira [MNEMON: Research and Publications on the History of the Ancient World], 2005, no. 4, pp. 125-166. (In Russian).
12. Behdad A. Orientalism matters. Modern Fiction Studies, 2010, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 709-728.
13. Varisco D.M. Reading Orientalism: Said and the Unsaid. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2007, 518 p.
14. Varisco D.M. Orientalism’s wake: the ongoing politics of a polemic. The Middle East Institute Viewpoints, 2009, no. 12, pp. 1-36.
15. Gilley B. The case for colonialism. Third World Quarterly, 2017, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1369037
16. Alimdzhanov B.A. Oriyentalizm oriyentalizmu rozn’ [Orientalisms may differ]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya – Vestnik of St Petersburg University. History, 2019, vol. 64, issue 4, pp. 1488-1497. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2019.420. (In Russian).
17. Alayev L.B. Oriyentalistika i oriyentalizm. Pochemu kniga Edvarda Saida ne imela uspekha v Rossii? [Orientalistics and Orientalism. Why didn’t Edward Said’s book succeed in Russia?]. Oriyentalizm vs. Oriyentalistika [Orientalism vs. Orientalistics]. Moscow, LLC “Sadra”, 2016, pp. 8-13. (In Russian).
18. Alayev L.B. Vostokovedeniye, evropotsentrizm, oriyentalizm i tsivilizatsionnyye tsennosti [Oriental studies, eurocentrism, orientalism and civilizational values]. Vestnik IV RAN [Bulletin of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2018, no. 1, pp. 30-37. (In Russian).
19. Fursov A.I. Mir-sistemnyy analiz i ego kritiki. Nauchno-analiticheskiy obzor [World-system Analysis and Its Critics. Scientific and Analytical Review]. Moscow, INION Publ., 1996, 43 p. (In Russian).
20. Ionov I.N. Novaya global’naya istoriya i postkolonial’nyy diskurs [New global history and postcolonial discourse]. Istoriya i sovremennost’ [History and Modernity], 2009, no. 2 (10), pp. 33-60. (In Russian).
21. Panarin S.A. Edvard Said: kniga sofizmov [Edward Said: a book of sophisms]. Istoricheskaya ekspertiza – Historical Expertise, 2015, no. 2, pp. 78-105. (In Russian).
22. Shteyner E.S. Vostok, Zapad i oriyentalizm: mesto vostokovedeniya v globaliziru-yushchemsya mire [East, West and orientalism: the place of oriental studies in a globalizing world]. Oriyentalizm/oksidentalizm: yazyki kul’tur i yazyki ikh opisaniya [Orientalism/Occidentalism: Languages of Cultures and Languages of Their Description]. Moscow, Sovpadeniye Publ., 2012, pp. 15-24. (In Russian).
23. Serebriany S. «Orientalism»: a good word defamed. Oriyentalizm/oksidentalizm: yazyki kul’tur i yazyki ikh opisaniya [Orientalism/Occidentalism: Languages of Cultures and Languages of Their Description]. Moscow, Sovpadeniye Publ., 2012, pp. 25-33. (In Russian).
24. Bobrovnikov V.O., Miri S.J. (executive ed., ed.-compiler). Oriyentalizm vs. oriyentalistika [Orientalism vs. Oriental Studies]. Moscow, LLC “Sadra” Publ., 2016, 440 p. (In Russian).
25. Bobrovnikov V.O. Oriyentalizm – ne dogma, a rukovodstvo k deystviyu? O perevodakh i ponimanii knigi E.V. Saida v Rossii [Is Orientalism not a dogma, but a guide to action? On translations and understanding of the book by E.V. Said in Russia]. Oriyentalizm vs. oriyentalistika [Orientalism and Orientalistics]. Moscow, LLC “Sadra” Publ., 2016, pp. 53-77. (In Russian).
26. Schmitz M. Kulturkritik ohne Zentrum. Edward W. Said und die Kontrapunkte kritischer Dekolonisation, Berlin, Verlag, 2015, 434 S.
27. Brennan T. Places of Mind: A Life of Edward Said. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux Publ., 2021, 437 p.
Review
For citations:
Chistalev M.S. Rethinking E. Said’s “Orientalism” in modern Western and Russian scientific discourse. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2022;27(5):1352-1364. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2022-27-5-1352-1364
Views:
90
Email this article 