Preview

Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities

Advanced search

LINGUOCOGNITIVE FOUNDATIONS of teaching negation in English: lexical aspect

https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2018-23-177-7-15

Abstract

The necessity for search of new possibilities for optimization of foreign languages teaching is grounded in a number of peculiarities of the educational process, its communicative alignment and cultural base. The integration of cognitive linguistics into the structure of English lessons meets the requirements of both teaching language in its connection with the culture of the country and communicative nature of such an education. The linguocognitive approach to teaching allows a successful implementation of the principles and methods of cognitive science for improving the efficiency of foreign lexis teaching, which was proven by a number of experimental studies. One of the main aspects of teaching lexis - teaching of lexical and phraseological units bearing negative meaning is being studied. There was evidence given for importance of negation in the structure of communicative acts, which allows to convey the meanings of absence, discrepancy, negative evaluation and communicative reaction, whereas the knowledge of the broad spectrum of the ways for representing negation in language is crucial for a successful communicative-oriented education as a fundamental principle for structuring of modern foreign language teaching. Negation is also considered as a culture-conditioned category, which is significant in linguoculture education. A number of evidences is provided to corroborate accordance of negation teaching with a number of criteria for comprehensive and balanced education.

About the Author

S. V. Motov
Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin; Western Illinois University
Russian Federation


References

1. Langacker R.W. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin; New York, 2001.

2. Taylor J.R. Some pedagogical implications of cognitive linguistics // Conceptualization and Mental Processing in Language / ed. by R.A. Geiger, B. Rudzka-Ostyn. Berlin, 1993. P. 201-226.

3. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, 1980.

4. Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, 1987.

5. Ungerer F., Schmid H.J. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Harlow, 2006.

6. Langacker R.W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, 1987.

7. Rosch E. Principles of Categorization. Berkeley, 1978.

8. Lowie W., Verspoor M. Making sense of polysemous words // Language Learning. 2003. Vol. 53. № 3. P. 547-586.

9. Matsumoto N. Bridges between cognitive linguistics and second language pedagogy: the case of corpora and their potential // SKY Journal of Linguistics. 2008. Vol. 21. P. 125-153.

10. Boers F., Lindstromberg S. Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology. Berlin, 2008.

11. Veliz L. A route to the teaching of polysemous lexicon: benefits from cognitive linguistics and conceptual metaphor theory // International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 2018. Vol. 7. № 1. P. 211-217.

12. Tyler A. Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Learning: Theoretical Basics and Experimental Evidence. N. Y., 2012.

13. Giovanelli M. Teaching Grammar, Structure and Meaning. Exploring Theory and Practice for Post-16 English Language Teachers. N. Y., 2015.

14. Поляков О.Г. Лингвистические аспекты проектирования курса английского языка для специальных целей // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. Тамбов: Грамота, 2013. № 12 (30). Ч. 1. C. 165-168.

15. Russell B. Logic and Knowledge. Essays, 1901-1950. N. Y., 1956.

16. Бондаренко В.Н. Отрицание как логико-грамматическая категория. М., 1983.

17. Болдырев Н.Н. Концептуализация функции отрицания как основа формирования категории // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2011. № 1 (026). С. 5-14.

18. Мотов С.В. Оценочный аспект концепта «отрицание» (на материале современного английского языка) // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. Тамбов, 2009. Вып. 4 (72). С. 100-105.

19. Horn L.R. A Natural History of Negation. Stanford, 2001.

20. Horn L.R. Multiple negation in English and other languages // The Expression of Negation. Berlin, 2010. P. 111-148.

21. Labov W. Languages in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, 1972. P. 201-240.

22. Тер-Минасова С.Г. Язык и межкультурная коммуникация. М., 2000.

23. NTC’s American English Learner’s Dictionary / ed. by R.A. Spears. Chicago, 1998.

24. Hornby A.S. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. Oxford, 1982.

25. Pavlović V. Cognitive linguistics and English language teaching at English departments // Facta Universitatis. Series: Linguistics and Literature. 2010. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 79-90.

26. Brewer’s Dictionary of Phrase and Fable / revised by A. Room. L., 1995.

27. Schmidt S.J. Texttheoretische Aspekte der Negation. N. Y., 1973.

28. Dijkstra K., Eerland A., Zijlmans J., Post L.S. Embodied cognition, abstract concepts, and the benefits of new technology for implicit body manipulation // Frontiers in Psychology. 2014. Vol. 5. P. 1-8.


Review

For citations:


Motov S.V. LINGUOCOGNITIVE FOUNDATIONS of teaching negation in English: lexical aspect. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2018;23(177):7-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2018-23-177-7-15

Views: 35


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-0201 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5825 (Online)