Preview

Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities

Advanced search

Culture memory dynamics as a research subject: approaches and solutions

Abstract

The relevance is determined by the dynamic nature of modern social processes, the neсessity to develop new methods of mobility, transfers, permanent changes of stable aspects of social reality studying. We analyze the extent to which the existing methodological and logical apparatus of authoritative social theories is suitable for the study of cultural memory in modern conditions. To solve this problem we analyze some methodological approaches and theories: the views of J. Urry, J. Olick, A. Assmann, F. Hartog, H. Lubbe, as well as actor-network theory, activity approach. The interdisciplinary nature of cultural memory studies has been substantiated, the consequence of which is the necessity for the synthesis of modern approaches of various humanities and social sciences capable of building a dynamic picture of the past. The relevance of the problem of matching the existing terminological vocabulary of modern humanities and social sciences to the needs of describing and understanding the dynamic picture of the world. It is proved that the most relevant tasks of the dynamic nature of cultural memory study are actor-network and activity approaches, as they allow to take into account the impact on the content of images of the past made by not only people, but also various material and non-material actors, as well as to test the explanatory model of the functioning of the culture memory in the conditions of various challenges (for example, the intensification of migration flows).

About the Authors

O. V. Golovashina
Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin
Russian Federation


A. A. Linchenko
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; Lipetsk State Technical University
Russian Federation


D. A. Anikin
Saratov State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Olick J., Robbins J. Social memory studies: from “Collective Memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices // Annual Review of Sociology. 1998. Vol. 24. P. 105-140.

2. Erll A., Rigny A. Introduction: cultural memory and its dynamics // Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory / ed. by A. Erll, A. Rigney. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2009. P. 1-14.

3. Ассман А. Распалась связь времен? Взлет и падение темпорального режима Модерна. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2017. 272 с.

4. Hartog F. Regimes of Historicity. Presentism and Experiences of Time. N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 2015. 288 р.

5. Лоуэнталь Д. Прошлое - чужая страна. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2004. 624 с.

6. Люббе Г. В ногу со временем. О сокращении нашего пребывания в настоящем // Вопросы философии. 1994. № 4. С. 94-107.

7. Лотман Ю.М. Семиосфера. СПб.: Искусство, 2001. 704 с.

8. Irwin-Zarecka I. Frames of Remembrance: The Dynamics of Collective Memory. New Brunswick: Transaction, 1994. 214 р.

9. Олик Д., Хлевнюк Д. Фигурации памяти: процессно-реляционная методология, иллюстрируемая на примере Германии // Социологическое обозрение. 2012. Т. 11. № 1. С. 40-74.

10. Кимелев Ю.А. Западная философия истории на рубеже XX-XXI вв.: аналитический обзор. М., 2009. 74 с.

11. Roldan G.C. Que queda de la filosofia de la historia de la illustration? // La comprension del passado. Escritos sobre filosofia de la historia / compilado por M. Cruz, D. Brauer. Barselona: Herder, 2005. Р. 187-216.

12. Nagl-Dosekal H. Ist Geschichtsphilosophie heute noch möglich? // Der Sinn des Historischen. Geschichtsphilosophische Debatten / hrsg. von H. Nagl-Dosekal. Frankfurt a/M: Fisher, 1996. S. 7-63.

13. Rohbeck J. Technik - Kultur - Geschichte. Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp, 1987. 283 S.

14. Перов Ю.В. Историчность и историческая реальность. СПб.: Изд-во Санкт-Петербург-ского философского общества, 2000. 272 c.

15. Jaeggi R. Kritik von Lebensformen. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2014. 451 S.

16. Писарев А., Астахов С., Гавриленко С. Акторно-сетевая теория: незавершенная сборка // Философско-литературный журнал Логос. 2017. № 1 (116). С. 1-40.

17. Bakhurst D. Social memory in Soviet thought // Collective Remembering / ed. by D. Middleton, D. Edwards. L.: SAGE Publications, 1990. Р. 203-227.

18. Ильенков Э.В. Об эстетической природе фантазии. М.: Кн. дом «Либроком», 2014. 128 с.

19. Нуркова В.В. Свершенное продолжается: Психология автобиографической памяти личности. М.: Изд-во Университета РАО, 2000. 315 с.

20. Нуркова В.В. Зеркало с памятью. Культурный феномен фотографии. М.: РГГУ, 2006. 287 с.


Review

For citations:


Golovashina O.V., Linchenko A.A., Anikin D.A. Culture memory dynamics as a research subject: approaches and solutions. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2018;23(174):191-202. (In Russ.)

Views: 46


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-0201 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5825 (Online)