Experience in training students and Post-Graduate students of high technologies in science cities of Russia
https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2021-26-191-7-23
Abstract
We analyze the domestic experience of training students and Post-Graduates of high technologies on the example of the leading universities of science cities of Russia: Biysk Technological Institute (branch of the Polzunov Altai State Technical University) (Biysk), Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna), Obninsk Institute for Nuclear Power Engineering – branch of National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” (Obninsk), Pushchino State Natural Science Institute (Pushchino). We consider educational programs, the main directions of research activity, interaction with enterprises, Research Institutes, Scientific Production Centers, interaction technologies. As a result, conceptual approaches to the successful development of the leading universities of science cities in Russia are identified: support for new companies (“startups”) the founders of which are usually enterprises, research institutes or universities; promotion of entrepreneurial independence of students and employees of higher educational institutions and research institutions; integration of large and small technology companies into innovative clusters; conducting student internships and performing research work in the laboratories of science cities; assistance from state, regional and local authorities, grant assistance.
About the Authors
M. S. ChvanovaRussian Federation
Marina S. Chvanova, Doctor of Pedagogy, Professor, Professor of Information Systems and Technologies Department
73 Zemlyanoy Val St., Moscow 109004
I. A. Kiselyova
Russian Federation
Irina A. Kiselyova, Candidate of Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Mathematical Modeling and Information Technology Department
33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000
M. S. Anureva
Russian Federation
Maria S. Anureva, Senior Lecturer of the Mathematical Modeling and Information Technologies Department
33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000
References
1. Osipov A.G., Savinykh V.N., Makarenko N.N. Innopolisy i naukogrady: strategiya nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo proryva i «Chelovecheskiy faktor» [Innopolises and science cities: strategy of scientific and technological breakthrough and “Human factor”]. Interekspo Geo-Sibir’ [Interexpo Geo-Siberia], 2019, vol. 5, pp. 93-97. (In Russian).
2. Nikitskaya E.F., Oslopova T.P. Rol’ naukogradov v innovatsionnom razvitii Moskovskoy oblasti [The role of science cities in the innovative development of the Moscow Region]. Finansovaya ekonomika [Financial Economics], 2019, no. 10, pp. 606-611. (In Russian).
3. Chistyakova O.V. Sovremennyye tendentsii formirovaniya i razvitiya tekhnopolisov i naukogradov [Modern trends in the formation and development of technopolises and science cities]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment – Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Management, 2011, no. 2, pp. 43-48. (In Russian).
4. Kopytina A.V., Popova O.V. Formirovaniye universal’nykh kompetentsiy studentov v sotsial’noproyektnoy deyatel’nosti (na primere naukograda Biyska) [Development of universal competencies of students in social and project activities (on the example of the science city of Biysk)]. Materialy 21 Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii molodykh uchenykh, studentov i uchashchikhsya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem «Nauka i obrazovaniye: problemy i perspektivy» [Proceedings of the 21th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference of Scholars, Students with International Participation “Science and Education: Problems and Prospects”]. Biysk, 2019, pp. 287-293. (In Russian).
5. Rybakov Y.L., Vikulov O.V. Osnovnyye napravleniya povysheniya effektivnosti nauchno-prakticheskoy deyatel’nosti naukogradov [The main directions of increasing the efficiency of scientific and practical activities of science cities]. Innovatika i ekspertiza: nauchnyye trudy [Innovation and Expertise: Scientific Works], 2017, no. 3 (21), pp. 87-98. (In Russian).
6. Lebedev A.M., Eliseyeva T.V. Innovatsionnyye klastery v ramkakh strategii osobykh ekonomicheskikh zon i naukogradov [Innovation clusters within the strategy of special economic zones and science cities]. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Institutsional’nyye i finansovyye mekhanizmy razvitiya territorial’nykh klasterov i tekhnologicheskikh platform» [Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Institutional and Financial Mechanisms for the Development of Territorial Clusters and Technological Platforms”]. Dubna, 2018, pp. 156-170. (In Russian).
7. Tiras K.P., Klimenko S.V., Aslanidi K.B. Novoye litso naukogradov Rossii: ot nauki k praktike cherez obrazovaniye i kul’turu [The new face of Russian science cities: from science to practice through education and culture]. Naukograd nauka proizvodstvo obshchestvo [Science City Science Production Society], 2017, no. 2, pp. 85-96. (In Russian).
8. Leonov G.V. Ne vse filialy odinakovy [Not all affiliates are the same]. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Higher Education in Russia, 2009, no. 4, pp. 85-89. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Chvanova M.S., Kiselyova I.A., Anureva M.S. Experience in training students and Post-Graduate students of high technologies in science cities of Russia. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2021;26(191):7-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2021-26-191-7-23