Integration of international students into the Russian linguistic and cultural space through distance learning

Importance. In the context of higher education globalization, Russia is actively attracting international students, whose successful adaptation impacts university reputation and the country's global standing. The purpose of the research is to analyze the potential of distance learning for integrating international students into the Russian linguistic and cultural space and to develop corresponding practical recommendations.

Materials and Methods. The study involved 67 international students from Botswana, Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, China, Turkmenistan, and Kyrgyzstan, who were enrolled at the following Russian universities: Stroganov Russian State University of Design and Applied Arts (Moscow), Derzhavin State University (Tambov), ITMO University (Saint-Petersburg), Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University (Magnitogorsk), Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, Tambov State Technical University (Tambov). The sample is of particular interest as it includes both representatives from CIS countries (Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan), known for their closer historical and cultural ties with Russia, and China, whose educational connections with Russia are strengthening, as well as students from Maghreb countries, North (Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt) and Southern Africa (Botswana), who experience a greater linguistic and cultural distance. The objects of analysis were the key advantages and barriers to academic and sociocultural integration. The analysis of the results was based on methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis of empirical data. The goal of the analysis was to identify the key advantages and barriers and, based on the empirical data, to propose specific mechanisms for successful integration.

Results and Discussion. The analysis of the empirical data revealed not only varying levels but also a differing structure of difficulties in academic and sociocultural integration, which directly correlates with the students' initial linguacultural preparation. Statistically significant differences in the structure of difficulties proved to be dependent on the region of origin: for the vast majority (95 %) of non-CIS students, the key problems were listening comprehension and speaking practice (t = 2.81 at p ≤ 0.05), indicating difficulties in overcoming the initial communication barrier. At the same time, students from Turkmenistan and Kyrgyzstan reported difficulties with academic writing and mastering specialized vocabulary significantly more often (t = 2.14 at p ≤ 0.05), which signifies their transition to the next stage – mastering the cognitive-academic language proficiency. The analysis of specific integration barriers showed a statistically significant prevalence of the following difficulties: In the sphere of academic communication: understanding lectures (41.7 %; t = 1.81 at p ≤ 0.05) and, particularly, communication with instructors (58.3 %; t = 2.46 at p ≤ 0.05); In the sphere of social interaction: communication with Russian students (50.0 %; t = 2.14 at p ≤ 0.05); In the sphere of academic skills: reading academic literature (58.3 %; t = 2.46 at p ≤ 0.05) and writing academic papers (58.3 %; t = 2.46 at p ≤ 0.05). The study did not reveal statistically significant difficulties in the area of everyday communication (33.3 %) or for the group of students reporting no problems (16.7 %). This is explained by the successful completion of this integration stage by the time of the survey, as well as by the formation of close-knit ethnic communities that minimize the need for daily interaction with the host environment.

Conclusion. The study proves that distance learning is a promising tool for integrating international students, provided all adaptation aspects are digitalized. The findings are useful for creating educational programs that facilitate socio-cultural adaptation and strengthen international academic cooperation.

1. Demidova T.A., Novikova A.V., Sherina E.A. (2025). Analysis of perception by foreign students of an abrupt change of an educational mode. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 132-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-1-132-147, https://elibrary.ru/dmczty

2. Savinova E.S., Masterskikh S.V. (2023). Socio-cultural adaptation of foreign students in Russian universities. Naukosfera, no. 1-1, pp. 171-174. https://elibrary.ru/gfmqpn

3. Abaeva E.A. (2019). Sociocultural adaptation of foreign students in Russian universities. Molodezh’. Obshchestvo. Sovremennaya nauka, tekhnika i innovatsii, no. 18, pp. 96-99. https://elibrary.ru/rlxycz

4. Statkevich E.A. (2025). Work organization on the socio-cultural adaptation of foreign students at a technical university. Sbornik nauchnykh statei po materialam 16 Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Yazyki, kul’tury, etnosy. Formirovanie yazykovoi kartiny mira: filologicheskii i metodicheskii aspekty» = Collection of Scientific Articles on the Proceedings of the 16th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Languages, Cultures, and Ethnic Groups. Formation of the Linguistic Worldview: Philological and Methodological Aspects”. Ioshkar-Ola, pp. 611-616. https://elibrary.ru/pbhllg

5. Deeva N.V. (2024). Cultural adaptation of foreign students in a professional educational organization: overcoming cultural shock. Obrazovanie. Kar’era. Obshchestvo, no. 4 (83), pp. 6-8. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/dxroet

6. Bakhmutskaya Yu.A., Kosacheva T.A., Kryukova O.A. (2023). Experience of using distance learning technologies in foreign language classes at a non-linguistic higher education institution. Gumanitarnye nauki (g. Yalta), no. 2 (62), pp. 87-94. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qjamnd

7. Suvorova S.L. (2021). The implementation of distance technologies of learning a foreign language as a condition of innovation of the educational strategies of a university. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Education. Educational Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 90-98. https://doi.org/10.14529/ped210308, https://elibrary.ru/pzqzoz

8. Karaseva E.V. (2022). Online technologies and electronic educational resources in engineering education. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika. Psikhologiya, vol. 8 (74), no. 3, pp. 83-91. https://elibrary.ru/kkuasi

9. Bogomolov A.N., Dunaeva L.A. (2023). Environment for teaching Russian as a foreign language in the settings of digital education transformation. Russkii yazyk za rubezhom, no. 4 (299), pp. 4-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37632/PI.2023.299.4.001, https://elibrary.ru/cujwbj

10. Dunaeva L.A., Levina G.M., Bogomolov A.N., Vasil’eva T.V. (2020). Digitalization of the Russian as a foreign language area: first results and perspectives. Russkii yazyk za rubezhom, no. 5 (282), pp. 4-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37632/pi.2020.282.5.001, https://elibrary.ru/eennww

11. Feizer Zh.I., D’yakova T.A. (2023). Stages of development of digital linguodidactics of Russian as a foreign language. Rusistika = Russian Language Studies, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 196-211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2023-21-2-196-211, https://elibrary.ru/ztmwvk

12. Sysoyev P.V., Filatov E.M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in teaching Russian as a foreign language. Rusistika = Russian Language Studies, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 300-317. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2024-22-2-300-317, https://elibrary.ru/sohskz

13. Sysoyev P.V., Filatov E.M., Sorokin D.O. (2024). Feedback in foreign language teaching: from information technologies to artificial intelligence. Yazyk i kul’tura = Language and Culture, no. 65, pp. 242-261. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/65/11, https://elibrary.ru/plzyov

14. Sysoyev P.V. (2025). Personalized learning based on artificial intelligence: how ready are modern students for new educational opportunities. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 51-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-2-51-71, https://elibrary.ru/weagvq

15. Sharadgah T.A., Sa’di R.A. (2022). A systematic review of research on the use of artificial intelligence in English language teaching and learning (2015–2021): What are the current effects? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, vol. 21, pp. 337-377. https://doi.org/10.28945/4999, https://elibrary.ru/ikxool

16. Mageira K., Pittou D., Papasalouros A., Kotis K., Zangogianni P., Daradoumis A. (2022). Educational AI chatbots for content and language integrated learning. Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073239, https://elibrary.ru/guahrj

17. Schumann J.H. (1986). Research on the acculturation model for second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 379-392.

18. Brown H.D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco, 410 p.

19. Norton Peirce B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 9-31.

20. Vygotsky L.S., Cole M. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 159 p.

21. Byram M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Clevedon, 124 p.

22. Yajun Li, Adelberg E.A., Shufan Zhang (2025). How Chinese educators can enhance teaching Russian as a foreign language: an analysis of classroom instruction differences in higher education institutions of China and Russia. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 884-898. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-4-884-898, https://elibrary.ru/zstmrc

23. Miloserdova E.M., Morozov E.A. (2024). Game-based learning as a pedagogical approach to enhance students’ motivation in learning Russian as a second language. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 724-733. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-3-724-733, https://elibrary.ru/xjkqsr

24. Ovsii E.S. (2025). Implementation of a communicative approach in the dialog simulators’ structure in Russian for preparatory faculties’ students. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 660-671. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2025-30-3-660-671, https://elibrary.ru/hxofrl

25. Evstigneev M.N., Evstigneeva I.A. (2021). Distance learning technologies in foreign language teaching. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, vol. 26, no. 190, pp. 25-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2021-26-190-25-32, https://elibrary.ru/jrrzcn