Mexico and Austria-Hungary: a difficult path to normalize relations
https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-1-233-245
Abstract
Importance. The reasons for the restoration of interstate contacts between Mexico and Austria- Hungary at the beginning of the 20th century are analyzed and their evolution during the “porphyriate”, the Mexican Revolution of 1910–1917 and the World War I is traced.
Materials and Methods. Based on a critical analysis of domestic and foreign research literature using historical-genetic and historical-comparative methods, the course of resolving the longstanding interstate conflict and the evolution of military-political and trade relations between Mexico and Austria-Hungary in the last third of the 19th century – 1918 are traced.
Results and Discussion. The development of military-political and economic contacts between Mexico City and Vienna, interrupted after the execution of Maximilian Habsburg in 1867, took place after their resumption in 1901, despite the initial dissatisfaction expressed by the Hungarian parliamentary opposition with the infringement of national economic interests on a mutually beneficial basis. The reasons for this were both the internal needs of Mexico, which was in dire need of human resources, and the desire of the business circles of Austria-Hungary to join the struggle for the application of capital and markets overseas.
Conclusion. During the revolution of 1910–1917, special attention was paid to Austria-Hungary’s increasing arms exports to Mexico, in the context of which Vienna considered the possibility of recognizing a particular political regime. The leadership of the Habsburg Monarchy also showed interest in Mexico as a possible base for its navy overseas. Austria-Hungary’s diplomacy in Mexico City during the World War I acted in line with Germany’s efforts to involve Mexico in a military conflict with the United States in order to prevent them from joining the Entente.
About the Author
V. V. MironovRussian Federation
Vladimir V. Mironov, Dr. Habil. (History), Associate Professor, Professor of History and Philosophy Department
ScopusID: 57200071166, ResearcherID: ITT-4271-2023
33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov, 392000, Russian Federation
References
1. Agstner R. (2007). Austria (-Hungary) and her diplomatic and consular missions in Mexico and Guatemala. Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs (MÖSTA), vol. 52, S. 273-302. (In German)
2. Blaas R. (1955). Die Gedächtniskapelle in Queretaro und die Wiederaufnahme der diplomatischen Beziehungen zwischen Österreich-Ungarn und Mexiko. MÖSTA, vol, 8. S. 191-222. (In German)
3. Platoshkin N.N. (2011). Istoriya Meksikanskoi revolyutsii. Istoki i pobeda 1810–1917 gg.: V 3 T. T. 1. [The History of the Mexican Revolution. The Origins and Victory of 1810–1917: in 3 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Russkii fond sodeistviya obrazovaniyu i nauke Publ., 432 p. (In Russ.)
4. Szente-Varga M. (2017). El Baúl de las Nomeolvides Relaciones Hungaro–Mexicanas. Budapest, Dialóg Campus, 158 p. (In Spanish)
5. Salm-Salm Felix Prinz zu. Queretaro (1868). Blätter aus meinem Tagebuch in Mexico. Nebst einem Auszuge aus dem Tagebuche der Prinzessin Agnes zu Salm-Salm: 2 in einem Band. Stuttgart, Kröner, 296 S. (In German)
6. Venkovits B. (2020). New immigration and images of the Americas: the effects of travel writing in Hungary. Latin America and Hungary. Cultural Ties. Budapest, Dialóg Campus, pp. 89-105.
7. Venkovits B. (2015). Migration, Travel Writing and Propaganda: Hungarians in Porfirian Mexico. Latin America and Hungary. Cultural Ties. Budapest, Dialóg Campus, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4000/ideas.1182
8. Yasi O. (2011). Raspad Gabsburgskoi monarkhii [The Collapse of the Habsburg Monarchy]. Moscow, Tri kvadrata Publ., 607 p. (In Russ.)
9. Dahlmann D. (1986). Land und Freiheit. Machnovščina und Zapatizmo als Beispiele agrarrevolutionärer Bewegungen. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 296 S. (In German)
10. Peganov A.O. (2022). Police violence during the “Belle Epoqueˮ. Formation and activity of the Hungarian Royal Gendarmerie (1881–1914). Novaya i noveishaya istoriya = Modern and Contemporary History, no. 1, pp. 44-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013038640018257-0, https://elibrary.ru/bbboif
11. Bader-Zaar V. (2022). Democratization and the practices of voting in Habsburg Austria, 1896–1914: new directions in research. Austrian History Yearbook, vol. 53, pp. 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0067237822000042
12. Fassmann H. (1996). Auswanderung aus der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie 1869–1910. Auswanderungen aus Österreich. Von der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts bis zur Gegenwart. Wien; Köin; Weimar, Böhlau- Verlag, S. 33-55. (In German)
13. Deusch E. (2017). Die effektiven Konsuln Österreich (-Ungarns) von 1825–1918. Ihre Ausbildung, Arbeitsverhältnisse und Biografien. Köln; Weimar; Wien, Böhlau-Verlag, 735 S. (In German)
14. Schmied-Kowarzik A. (2010). Unteilbar und untrennbar? Die Verhandlungen zwischen Cisleithanien und Ungarn zum gescheiterten Wirtschaftsausgleich 1897. Innsbruck; Wien; Bozen, Studienverlag, 402 S. (In German)
15. Rauchensteiner M. (2014). The First World War and the End of the Habsburg Monarchy, 1914–1918. Wien, Köln, Weimar, Böhlau-Verlag, 1181 p.
16. Enriquez-Sanchez Antonio de Jesus. (2022). Reforma, militarismo y conmemoracion Usos y discursos de la fiesta durante el gobierno de Victoriano Huerta (1913–1914). Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporanea de Mexico, no. 64 (julio-diciembre), pp. 159-188. (In Spanish) https://doi.org/10.22201/iih.24485004e.2022.64.77731
17. Katz F. (1981). The Secret War in Mexico: Europe, the United States and the Mexican Revolution. Chicago, London, Chicago University Press, 659 p.
18. Redlich J. (1953). Schicksalsjahre Österreichs: 1908–1919; das politische Tagebuch Josef Redlichs. Bd. 1. 1908–1914. Graz-Köln, Verlag Hermann Böhlau Nachf, 295 S. (In German)
19. Rosenzweig G. (2012). Los diplomaticos Mexicanos durante la Revolucion. Entre el desemleo y el exilo. Historia Mexicana, vol. 61, no. 4, abril-junio, pp. 1461-1523. (In Spanish)
20. Sondhaus L. (1994). The Naval Policy of Austria-Hungary, 1867–1918: Navalism, Industrial Development and the Politics of Dualism. West Lafayett, Indiana, Purdue University Press, 458 p.
21. Sondhaus L. (1993). The Austro-Hungarian naval officer corps, 1867–1918. Austrian History Yearbook, vol. 24, pp. 51-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0067237800005257
22. Mertens Ch. (2013). Die Auswirkungen des Ersten Weltkriegs auf die Ernährung Wiens. Im Epizentrum des Zusammenbruchs. Wien im Ersten Weltkrieg. Wien, Metroverl, S. 162-172. (In German)
23. Tóth I. (2013). Kanya Kalman utja a külügyminiszteri székig. Történelmi Szemle, no. 2, pp. 225-260. (In Hungarian)
24. Katz F. (2002). Zum Geleit. Unserer Familie hat die mexikanische Politik das Leben gerettet. Österreicher im Exil. Mexiko 1938–1947. Wien, Deuticke, S. 9-12.
25. Manukhin A.A. (2015). «Germanskii faktor» v politike SSHA v Meksike v 1917–1918 godakh [The “German Factor” in U.S. Policy in Mexico in 1917–1918]. Novaya i noveishaya istoriya = Modern and Contemporary History, no. 4, pp. 20-30. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/uhsdct
26. Gebhard Louis A. (1968). Austria-Hungary’s Dreadnought Squadron: the Naval Outlay of 1911. Austrian History Yearbook, vol. 4, pp. 245-258.
Review
For citations:
Mironov V.V. Mexico and Austria-Hungary: a difficult path to normalize relations. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2024;29(1):233-245. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-1-233-245