Preview

Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities

Advanced search

LINGUOCOGNITIVE FOUNDATIONS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING

https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2018-23-175-37-44

Abstract

One of the main goals of foreign language teaching is establishing a communicative competence in students in its tight connection with the culture of the corresponding country. The modern foreign language pedagogy is in a constant search of the ways to improve the educational process. One of such ways - lignucognitive - is being considered. It allows to integrate the achievements of cognitive linguistics into the structure of communicative-oriented teaching for education quality improvement. There were mentioned the results of a number of scientific researches that have proven to be effective in implementing of different methods of cognitive linguistics while teaching lexical and grammatical aspects of foreign language. While focusing on a series of foreign language teaching linguocognitive studies it has been proven that the principles and methods of cognitive linguistics can be integrated into the structure of lessons. Such an integration meets a number of criteria for an effective education: accessibility, visualization, explication, motivation, anthropocentricity, structuredness, communicative orientation, cultural conditionality, reflectivity. Eventually that allows to achieve the main goal of the pedagogic process while teaching foreign languages - language acquisition in all its aspects and its connection to the culture of the corresponding country.

About the Author

S. V. Motov
Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin; Western Illinois University
Russian Federation


References

1. Дружинин А.С., Поляков О.Г. Когнитивная семантика в обучении грамматике английского языка (на примере согласования времен) // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2017. № 10 (76). Ч. 1. C. 199-202.

2. Поляков О.Г. Когнитивные и аффективные факторы успешного обучения иностранному языку в высшей школе // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2012. № 7 (18). Ч. 1. C. 162-164.

3. Шамов А.Н. Когнитивный подход в обучении лексической стороне речи. Н. Новгород, 2002.

4. Щепилова А.В. Коммуникативно-когнитивный подход к обучению французскому языку как второму иностранному. М., 2003.

5. Giovanelli M. Teaching Grammar, Structure and Meaning. Exploring Theory and Practice for Post-16 English Language Teachers. N. Y., 2015.

6. Golfam A., Dehghan M., Aghagolzade F., Kambuziya A. A cognitive perspective on teaching English vocabulary for language learners in Iran // Global Journal of Human Social Science Research. 2014. Vol. 14/7-G. P. 37-40.

7. Lowie W., Verspoor M. Making sense of polysemous words // Language Learning. 2003. Vol. 53/3. P. 547-586.

8. Taylor J.R. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford, 2002.

9. Поляков О.Г. Лингвистические аспекты проектирования курса английского языка для специальных целей // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2013. № 12 (30). Ч. 1. C. 165-168.

10. Тер-Минасова С.Г. Язык и межкультурная коммуникация. М., 2000.

11. Мильруд Р.П., Максимова И.Р. Современные концептуальные принципы коммуникативного обучения иностранным языкам // Иностранные языки в школе. 2003. № 6. С. 9-16.

12. Evans V. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh, 2007.

13. Sáez N. Enhancing the role of meaning in the L2 classroom: a cognitive linguistics perspective // Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics. 2015. Vol. 15/2. P. 51-53.

14. Tyler A. Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Learning: Theoretical Basics and Experimental Evidence. N. Y., 2012.

15. Hudson R. Word grammar, cognitive linguistics and second-language learning and teaching // Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. N. Y., 2008. P. 89-113.

16. Littlemore J. Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke, 2009.

17. Falck M.J. Linguistic theory and good practice: how cognitive linguistics could influence the teaching and learning of English prepositions // Språkdidaktik: Researching Language Teaching and Learning. Umeå, 2015. P. 61-73.

18. Matsumoto N. Bridges between cognitive linguistics and second language pedagogy: the case of corpora and their potential // SKY Journal of Linguistics. 2008. Vol. 21. P. 125-153.

19. Boers F., Lindstromberg S. Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology. Berlin, 2008.

20. Veliz L. A route to the teaching of polysemous lexicon: benefits from cognitive linguistics and conceptual metaphor theory // International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 2017. Vol. 7/1. P. 211-217.

21. Dijkstra K., Eerland A., Zijlmans J., Post L.S. Embodied cognition, abstract concepts, and the benefits of new technology for implicit body manipulation // Frontiers in Psychology. 2014. Vol. 5. P. 1-8.


Review

For citations:


Motov S.V. LINGUOCOGNITIVE FOUNDATIONS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2018;23(175):37-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2018-23-175-37-44

Views: 60


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1810-0201 (Print)
ISSN 2782-5825 (Online)