Land use practices in the estates of landlords in the late XIX – early XX century
https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-2-492-501
Abstract
Importance. Unequal resource provision of owners’ property and a significant shortage of peasant hay and forest lands, aggravated by overgrowth and far-earth land, determined the practice of economic relations between landlords and communal farms.
Research Methods. The problem of land use in the landlord economy system of post-reform Russia remains one of the most difficult in agrarian historiography. In the writings of prerevolutionary historians, the modernization of estates is highlighted in the writings of conservatives who linked crisis moments in the economy of estates with insufficient state support for owners and liberal figures stratifying savings into labor and capitalist ones. In the works of Soviet historians, the modernization of the latifundia is severely criticized.
Results and Discussion. Many landlords, taking advantage of the positive situation in the grain market, expanded production and established a diversified economic complex. These trends were especially strong in estates with sugar and distilleries. However, even during the period of maximum capitalist development of the agricultural sector, the predominant form of land use of Latifundists remained a combination of running their own farm and rental distributions.
Conclusion. The transition from a serfdom to a productive economy was associated with the modernization of the field-growing complex of estates, the use of agricultural innovations. However, the active introduction of grass planting by owners and the mechanization of agriculture have long been combined with unproductive methods of agricultural development.
About the Author
R. M. ZhitinRussian Federation
Ruslan M. Zhitin, PhD (History), Research Scholar of Fractal Modeling of Social and Political Processes Center
33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov, 392000
References
1. Golovin K. (1899). Nasha finansovaya politika i zadachi budushchego, 1887-1898 [Our Financial policy and the tasks of the future, 1887-1898]. St. Petersburg, D.V. Chichinadze Publ., 261 p. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/view/01003644910 (in Russian)
2. Kovalchenko I. D., Selunskaya N.B., Litivak B.M. (1982). Social'no-ekonomicheskij stroj pomeshchich'ego hozyajstva Evropejskoj Rossii v epohu kapitalizma: Istochniki i metody izucheniya [The socio-economic structure of the landlord economy of European Russia in the era of capitalism: Sources and methods of study]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 264 p. (in Russian)
3. Anfimov A.M. (1969). Krupnoe pomeshchich'e hozyajstvo evropejskoj Rossii. (Konec XIX – nachalo XX v.) [Large landlord economy of European Russia. (Late XIX – early XX century)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 394 p. https://viewer.rsl.ru/rsl01007249764 (in Russian)
4. Mezenina T. G. (2007). Dinamika i sostav naseleniya stroganovskih vladenij na Urale v XVIII - pervoj polovine XIX veka [Dynamics and composition of the population of Stroganov possessions in the Urals in the XVIII – first half of the XIX century]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Istoriya [Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Episode 1: History], no. 3(81), pp. 41-46. https://elibrary.ru/mvmvxf (in Russian)
5. Zhitin R.M. (2018). Modeli hozyajstvennogo razvitiya pomeshchich'ih imenij Central'no-Chernozemnogo regiona v konce XIX – nachale XX veka [Models of economic development of landlords' estates in the Central Chernozem region in the late XIX – early XX century]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Humanities], vol. 23, no. 176, pp. 146-153. https://elibrary.ru/ynvnfr (in Russian)
6. Suvorin A.S. (1899). Vsya Rossiya. Russkaya kniga promyshlennosti, torgovli, sel'skogo hozyajstva i administracii: torgovo-promyshlennyj adres-kalendar' Rossijskoj imperii. T. 2 [The whole of Russia. The Russian book of industry, trade, agriculture and administration: commercial and industrial address-calendar of the Russian Empire. Vol. 2]. St. Petersburg, A. S. Suvorin Publ., 180 p. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/view/01005452506 (in Russian)
7. Dmitriev K.D. (1877). Kak vesti dohodnoe hozyajstvo s naimen'shimi na eto zatratami: Iz praktiki v raznyh mestnostyah Rossii agr. K.D. Dmitrieva [How to run a profitable farm with the least cost: From practice in different areas of Russia agr. K.D. Dmitriev]. Moscow, landowners of the Orel and Tula provinces Publ., 328 p. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/view/01003590269 (in Russian)
8. Rapp K.A. et at. (1908). Materialy po krest'yanskomu i chastnomu zemlevladeniyu Kurskoj gubernii: Ob"yasnit. zapiska i svod. vedomosti. T. 1 [Materials on peasant and private land ownership in Kursk province: Explain. a note and a summary. Vedomosti. Vol. 1]. Kursk: Kursk. the treasury. chamber Publ., 100 p. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01003750354 (in Russian)
9. Minarik L. P. (1971). Ekonomicheskaya harakteristika krupnejshih zemel'nyh sobstvennikov Rossii v konce XIX – nachale XX veka [Economic characteristics of the largest land owners of Russia in the late XIX – early XX century]. Moscow, Soviet Russia Publ., 145 p. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01007377977 (in Russian)
10. Anfimov A.M. (1961). Zemel'naya arenda v Rossii v nachale XX veka [Land lease in Russia at the beginning of the XX century]. Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publ., 208 p. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01005946748 (in Russian)
11. Zhitin R.M. (2014). Ekonomicheskie harakteristiki hozyajstvennyh kompleksov krupnyh imenij na mikrourovne: (Po materialam Novo-Pokrovskogo imeniya Orlovyh-Davydovyh i Rakityanskogo imeniya Yusupovyh) [Economic characteristics of economic complexes of large estates at the micro level: (Based on the materials of the Novo-Pokrovsky estate of the Orlov-Davydovs and the Rakityansky estate of the Yusupovs)]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Humanities], no. 11(139), pp. 258-266. https://elibrary.ru/tbzusl (in Russian)
12. Zhukov Y.M. (1898). Kratkoe opisanie Parhomovskogo imeniya P.I. Haritonenko s prilozheniem otchetov po proizvedennym issledovaniyam i polevym opytam [A brief description of the Parkhomovsky estate of P.I. Kharitonenko with the application of reports on the research and field experiments]. Kiev, Kiev. slovo Publ., 118 p. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01003682789 (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Zhitin R.M. Land use practices in the estates of landlords in the late XIX – early XX century. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2024;29(2):492-501. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20310/1810-0201-2024-29-2-492-501