The current state of development of think tanks in Central Asia and their impact on policy-making processes

Importance. Over the past three decades of independence, fundamental transformations in the political and economic systems have led to profound changes in the social environments of the Central Asian countries. Think tanks, as integral components of modern public administration systems, play a significant role in the political processes of the five Central Asian states, which operate under incomplete democratic systems. Concurrently, given the region's strategic role as a key hub connecting Asia and Europe and a vital bridge for Sino-Russian cooperation, analyzing the current status and developmental disparities among these think tanks holds substantial practical value.
Materials and Methods. Based on think tank rankings published by the University of Pennsylvania's research group and supplementary data from five Central Asian countries, 51 influential think tanks were selected for a comprehensive study. Through statistical analysis, text analysis, case studies, historical research, and comparative analysis, this research systematically examines: the current status and characteristics of Central Asian think tanks; their management and operational odels; the approaches and effectiveness of their participation in policy-making processes; the reasons for disparities in their engagement with political processes.
Results and Discussion. Central Asian think tanks can be roughly divided into three main categories: government, academic, and independent. Their funding sources are diverse, and their research covers a wide range of areas. However, the level of development and influence on government decision-making vary from country to country, depending on political institutions and socioeconomic conditions. Additionally, their organizational and operational models are characterized by relative closeness, meaning information on financing and project management mechanisms is rarely available from open sources. The role of these think tanks in national politics can be divided into two areas: direct influence on policy formation and indirect influence through shaping public opinion.
Conclusion. Among the various types of Central Asian think tanks, government-affiliated institutions exert the strongest influence on decision-making, followed by academic entities, while independent ones have the least impact. Nationally, Kazakhstan‟s think tanks hold the greatest influence, with Uzbekistan ranking second, Kyrgyzstan third, and Tajikistan and Turkmenistan demonstrating the lowest policy impact. This hierarchy correlates with each country‟s political openness, institutional maturity, and think tanks‟ integration into governance processes.

1. Belyaeva N., Zajczev D. (2009). Think tanks in Russia and Western countries: a comparative analysis. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations, no. 1, pp. 26-35. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/jvinkn

2. Kudayarov K.A. (2022). Analytical centers of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Evrazijskie issledovaniya. Istoriya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Eurasian Studies. History. Political Science. International RElations Series, no. 4, pp. 60-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7648-2022-4-60-72, https://elibrary.ru/evolva

3. Kudayarov K.A. (2022). Think tanks in Tajikistan. Soczial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya I zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 9: Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika = Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 9: Oriental and African Studies, no. 4, pp. 52-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/rva/2022.04.04, https://elibrary.ru/rerbfd

4. Kudayarov K.A. (2023). “Thought factories” in modern Kyrgyzstan. Rossiya i musul’manskij mir = Russia and the Moslem World, no. 2 (328), pp. 44-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/rimm/2023.02.04, https://elibrary.ru/lsduak

5. Kudayarov K.A. (2024). University and academic analytical centers of Central Asia. Soczial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Seriya 9: Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika = Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 9: Oriental and African Studies, no. 1, pp. 20-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31249/RVA/2024.01.02, https://elibrary.ru/rqxvci

6. Zhou Qi. (2011). The U.S. Foreign Policy-Making Process. Beijing, China Social Sciences Press, 492 p. (In Chinese)

7. Zhao Changqing. (2014). A New Theory on the Five Central Asian Countries. Beijing, Kunlun Publishing House, 433 p. (In Chinese)

8. Sun Zhuangzhi. (2020). 30 Years of Political and Social Development in the Five Central Asian Countries: Trends and Evaluation. Beijing, China Social Sciences Press, 482 p. (In Chinese)

9. (2020). The Landscape of Ideas: An Overview of Global Think Tank Development. Shanghai, Shanghai People‟s Publishing House, 346 p. (In Chinese)