Paradiplomacy of the states of the Austrian Republic in the Alpine region (the example of Salzburg, Tyrol and Vorarlberg)

Importance. In today’s globalized world, paradiplomacy plays a crucial role in shaping state-level foreign policies. Exploring how subnational entities engage externally enhances our comprehension of current geopolitical dynamics. Focusing on Austria, whose federal states (Länder) constitutionally manage external affairs, provides insights into regional diplomatic structures and practices. Specifically examining Salzburg, Tyrol, and Vorarlberg offers fresh perspectives on paradiplomatic interactions. The aim of the study is to determine the mutual influence between the Austrian Länder and the federal center on the development of external relations.
Materials and Methods. Case studies analyze collaboration initiatives within Alpine regions and evaluate paradiplomacy’s impact during ethnic conflicts like those in Bolzano. Qualitative content analysis examines official documentation from partnership organizations and project frameworks to assess Länder involvement in interregional collaborations.
Results and Discussion. These findings fill gaps in Russian academic literature regarding Austrian Länder diplomacy. Highlighting subnational actor engagement in pan-European processes is critical yet underrepresented in existing Russian scholarship. The conclusions of the work also have practical significance, as the experience accumulated by the Austrian Länder can be creatively rethought and adapted for application within the framework of the regional policy of the Russian Federation.
Conclusion. Paradiplomacy mechanisms successfully facilitate transboundary cooperation between Austrian Länder and European Union territories. Efforts of the Austrian Alpine Länder focus on addressing ecological challenges while fostering educational advancement and safeguarding cultural heritage. Each Land demonstrates substantial capacity to shape Austria’s overall foreign relations due to shared interests with adjacent nations. Cooperation across Alpine administrative units remains stable, sustained through ongoing collaborative ventures embedded in long-term strategic partnerships.

1. Kuznetsov A.S. (2014). Theory and Practice of Paradiplomacy: Subnational Governments in International Affairs. London, 256 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315817088, https://elibrary.ru/wdcrfi

2. Kamiński T. (2018). Paradiplomacy – discourse analysis and research conceptualization. Paradiplomacy in Asia: Case studies of China, India and Russia, pp. 15-36. https://doi.org/10.18778/8088-615-5.02

3. Nye J.S., Keohane R.O. (1971). Transnational relations and world politics: an introduction. International Organization, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 329-349.

4. Duchacek I. (2001). Perforated sovereignties: towards a typology of new actors in international relations. Federalism and International Relations: The Role of Subnational Units. Oxford, pp. 1-33.

5. Lecours A. (2008). Political Issues of Paradiplomacy: Lessons from the Developed World. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy. The Hague, 22 p.

6. Cornago N. (1999). Diplomacy and paradiplomacy in the redefinition of international security: Dimensions of conflict and co‐operation. Regional & Federal Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569908421070

7. Akimov Yu.G. (2021). International activities of subnational actors and foreign policy of the nation state: models of interaction and interpretations. Sravnitel’naya politika = Comparative Politics Russia, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 33-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2021-10026, https://elibrary.ru/faqcwj

8. Schiavon J.A. (2018). Comparative Paradiplomacy. London, Routledge, 226 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351012317

9. Keating M. (2000). Paradiplomacy and regional networking. Forum of Federations: an International Federalism. Hanover, pp. 105-116.

10. Pelinka A. (1990). Austria. In: Federalism and International Relations. Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 124-141.

11. Pelinka A. (1999). The (in)compatibility of corporatism and federalism: Austrian social partnership and the EU. West European Politics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 116-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389908425304, https://elibrary.ru/havvjv

12. Bußjäger P. (2022). Föderalismus und die „Außenpolitik“ der Länder. Handbuch Außenpolitik Österreichs. Wiesbaden, S. 121-140. (In German) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37274-3_6

13. Bußjäger P. (2009). Local government cooperation in Austria: Options and benefits for the communities. Crossing the Line: Dealing with Cross-Border Communities, ch. 6, pp. 81-92.

14. Bußjäger P., Schramek C. (2020). Austria (Federal Republic of Austria): balancing distributed federalism with centralization. The Forum of Federations Handbook of Federal Countries-2020. Ottawa, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42088-8

15. Weigend G.G. (1950). Effects of boundary changes in the South Tyrol. Geographical Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 364-375.

16. Haller M. (2006). South Tyrol – an economic or political success story? An investigation of the factors contributing to the solution of an ethnic-national conflict. Demokratie und Erinnerung. Südtirol – Österreich – Italien. Innsbruck; Wien; Bozen, Studien Verlag, pp. 131-154.

17. Alvarez M. (2020). The rise of paradiplomacy in international relations. E-International Relations, pp. 1-6.

18. (1930). Austria: Bundesgesetzblatt für die Republik Österreich. Wien. (In German)

19. Brix E. (2022). Forschung und Lehre zu Außenpolitik. In: Handbuch Außenpolitik Österreichs. Wiesbaden, S. 205-224. (In German) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37274-3

20. Chiti P. (2023). The Austrian 1925 general administrative procedure act: a view from Italy. In: The Austrian Codification of Administrative Procedure: Diffusion and Oblivion, 1920–1970. Oxford, pp. 179-184. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867623.001.0001

21. Eberhard H., Lachmayer K. (2018). Constitutional reform 2008 in Austria. Journal of International Constitutional Law, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 112-123.

22. Gamper A. (2012). Local government in Austria. Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a Comparative Legal Perspective. Madrid, National Institute of Public Administration, pp. 23-44.

23. Köhler M. (2015). The reform of the administrative jurisdiction in Austria – theoretical background and main features of the system. Mykolo Romerio Universitetas, no. 14, pp. 31-63.

24. Dolezal M., Fallend F. (2023). Die Länder: Landtage und Landesregierungen. In: Das Politische System Österreichs. Vienna, Böhlau Verlag, S. 213-242. (In German)

25. Ciesielska-Klikowska J., Kamiński T. (2022). Paradiplomacy and its impact on EU foreign policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 48-66. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1223, https://elibrary.ru/bpxuvg

26. Exenberger A. (2011). Globalization and Austria: past and present. Global Austria: Austria’s Place in Europe and the World. Contemporary Austrian Studies, vol. 20, pp. 26-46.

27. Heiß H. (2020). Die Euregio Tirol-Südtirol-Trentino – Eine Skizze jüngerer Entwicklungspfade. In: Die schwierige Versöhnung. Italien, Österreich und Südtirol im 20 Jahrhundert. Ungari, S. 539-562. (In German)